There are no old dems who hate what's going on though, or they're a very very small minority. I know and see plenty of older dems who simply don't know that the tranny shit is happening, they think "woke" is a boogeyman DeSantis made up, and they just believe MSM all the time no matter what. Most of them don't really use the internet, and if they do, they aren't very savvy with it at all.
Most of them would easily flip, it's just the how part that I'm stuck on.
I agree. However, 2016 happened because they didn't anticipate the turnout, and couldn't produce enough fraud in real time. In 2020, they took no chances and extended the election by a week to do so. Assuming the real vote totals for Trump in 2020 (likely the 81 million that is claimed to have gone to Biden), is there really much of a chance of significantly bypassing that? It seems Trump won every state, except for three.
If we thought banning (R) poll workers and blocking the windows was bad, just imagine what they have in store for 2024. After all, nothing was done about it last time, and they gaslight and laughed in our faces about it.
I don't really see the point that the continuation of Trump's E.O. is an indication of WH control. So they continued a law against election fraud, that they will undoubtedly break anyways, just as break every other law they create, and use it against you if they see fit.
Isn't that business as usual? Rules for thee not for me?
Unfortunately I had to get the Vax due to work, and wasn't in a position to just quit. I did get the J&J one though, and all the horror stories seem to come from Pfizer and Moderna. Should I be worried, and if so, what should I do? Never boosted, just the one and done to keep my job
The trial could never be legal anyways. There's no one in the country who isn't biased for or against Trump. A jury of 12 is never going to be unbiased, nor will every single one of them be a Trump-hater - every single one of them will end in a mistrial because the jury will have made up their minds before the case begins. If he's convicted in any of these cases, then the jury was illegally selected and/or tampered with.
Not everything is comms. He doesn't even run his Twitter account. The admins are instructed to virtue signaling for woke stuff. The @ in question is a black athlete who who just won something we're supposed to care about. This is just his staffers virtue signaling for brownie points.
The one part that makes me question this is when he said Obama pulled out a pipe to smoke the coke. That's not how it works though. You can't just smoke the coke, you would have to turn it into freebase first, which isn't going to happen in the back of a limo.
Eh, I don't think that "nameless faceless" rich elite trope really exists to that large of an extent today. It did years back, prior to the internet and all the public information that became available because of it. With that amount of money, there is a trail. Years ago scum like Soros would've been unknown to the public, and even with how well known he is in spaces like this, most of the general public still has no idea who he is.
This. An executive order that overhauls all the loopholes that allow for them to take advantage of welfare.
Also, secret visits to manufacturing plants all over the country - after this, executive order overhauling labor law loopholes that allow their hiring.
After that, address the nation on live broadcast, announcing that in 2 months time, any illegal caught still in this country will be subject to 25-life in the slammer.
Do these things, and the vast majority of those not caught will be scrambling to go back.