Since we know that ivermectin is capable of fighting of just about everything. I’ve even read there are studies showing it has been shown to eliminate certain types of cancer. Are there any studies on ivermectin vs. nipah?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
I’ve become more and more convinced that the double snake wrapped around a staff symbol of the medical industry is not so subtle nod to the fact that their entire industry is built on hiding the prevalence and impact of parasite infections in human beings. In some apocryphal biblical texts I’ve read Jesus has specifically referred to parasites as the very devils/demons/satan that he casts out of people through faith and various other means. No story better reflects that than the story of the lepers bathing in the Jordan river in the pseudepigraphal “Nazarene Gospel of Peace” where Jesus literally has the lepers fast (starves the parasites), sunbathe (vitamin D explosion), swim (exercise to burn off remaining calories, enhancing the effects of the fast), drink water (pure hydration), take water enemas (flush them out and enhance the fast), pray (positive thinking proven to have measurable effects on immune systems), and a few other such natural treatments that ultimately cured their illnesses. Ivermectin is a medicine derived from soil and is known to cure river blindness. Jesus literally uses clay mud to cure people of their blindness in that story (he did the sane with another blind man in I believe the book of Matthew).
I watched an incredible video not too long ago with a parasitologist and an oncologist that talks about how what oncologist think are cancer cells, parasitologists know are nothing but parasitic cysts. These disciplines are so intentionally siloed though that the vast majority of oncologists never even hear about this. It’s a massive conspiracy and everyone, even doctors, are victims.