You a bit of a know it all and not at all worth engaging with. You should know, I think you are stupid and misguided, that’s if you are not here as cognitive infiltration.
I am a bit of a "know it all." I was rated high for that in my performance reviews at work. But what I do know is solid; I don't much butt in when the matter is not my strength. You, on the other hand, have no credentials and use this opportunity to throw insults at me. The stupid and misguided ones are the Flat-Earthers, Moon-Hoaxers, space travel deniers, chemtrail hawkers, and orbiting DEW believers. (But on the last point, stay tuned. The Chinese have announced they plan to orbit a 1 MW laser next year, and I will be very interested to see if and how they pull it off.)
But I was rated for my breadth and depth of technical knowledge. Not for any lapse of decorum. And what I know is solid. Enough to win military development contracts by competitive procurement (e.g., YAL-1A).
Credentials are public evidence of your competence. Being shy about offering them is basically a cover for not having any. I don't subscribe to the internet principle of egalitarianism, where we are all experts until shown otherwise.
I "understand" insults in only one way: When your opponent is out of argument, they are his last resort. It's playground stuff. I'm long over it.
The stupid and misguided ones lack basic education and logical powers. This is based on listening closely to what they have to say. They are perhaps the most profoundly ignorant lot I have encountered. (The recent flap in these pages over the Mercator map projection illustrates the point.)
The difference between us is that I do bother, to communicate. You seem interested mainly in playing to the Peanut Gallery. I know all about that. So, we've had all this interaction in the spirit of dick-fighting, and there has been no discussion of any important point. Don't you see that as a missed opportunity?
Oh! it's the arrogant stupidity from a misguided person that is obviously intelligent and persistent.
ok
ok
This organization was created in 2007 and is populated with credentialed architects and engineers. What ever your credentials are (and no, assuming you are a fren, you do not want to reveal this online because of the cancel culture we are in, simply posting here may be cause for some people to cause you problems at work) we can reasonably agree that credentialled architects are able to comment on building that were standing one day, and not standing the next.
https://www.ae911truth.org/
in this discussion we do not stray into why things happened. There are all kinds of potential why's and so few hard facts to ground that conversation. So let's stick with just what did happen and what evidence substantiates that understanding of events.
we take one issue at a time. This way we can fully explore a single issue while preventing the confusion of issues.
The first issue, is free fall in WTC 7. Please review this page. Please excuse my prior comments on freefall, I was saying them from memory. We will use what is printed here as the starting point for this discussion.
Took a quick look at your post history.
You a bit of a know it all and not at all worth engaging with. You should know, I think you are stupid and misguided, that’s if you are not here as cognitive infiltration.
I am a bit of a "know it all." I was rated high for that in my performance reviews at work. But what I do know is solid; I don't much butt in when the matter is not my strength. You, on the other hand, have no credentials and use this opportunity to throw insults at me. The stupid and misguided ones are the Flat-Earthers, Moon-Hoaxers, space travel deniers, chemtrail hawkers, and orbiting DEW believers. (But on the last point, stay tuned. The Chinese have announced they plan to orbit a 1 MW laser next year, and I will be very interested to see if and how they pull it off.)
"I am a bit of a "know it all." I was rated high for that in my performance reviews at work. "
It shows.
"But what I do know is solid;"
No. You are wrong, but you are highly confident in your ignorance.
"You, on the other hand, have no credentials"
You do not know this for a fact, yet you project this as a conclusion with great confidence. You are ignorant.
" and use this opportunity to throw insults at me."
Because it is a language you understand.
"The stupid and misguided ones are the Flat-Earthers, Moon-Hoaxers, space travel deniers, chemtrail hawkers, and orbiting DEW believers."
Are you evaluating information based upon information, or are you evaluating information within the filter of your prejudice and ignorance?
Don't bother, it was a rhetorical question.
But I was rated for my breadth and depth of technical knowledge. Not for any lapse of decorum. And what I know is solid. Enough to win military development contracts by competitive procurement (e.g., YAL-1A).
Credentials are public evidence of your competence. Being shy about offering them is basically a cover for not having any. I don't subscribe to the internet principle of egalitarianism, where we are all experts until shown otherwise.
I "understand" insults in only one way: When your opponent is out of argument, they are his last resort. It's playground stuff. I'm long over it.
The stupid and misguided ones lack basic education and logical powers. This is based on listening closely to what they have to say. They are perhaps the most profoundly ignorant lot I have encountered. (The recent flap in these pages over the Mercator map projection illustrates the point.)
The difference between us is that I do bother, to communicate. You seem interested mainly in playing to the Peanut Gallery. I know all about that. So, we've had all this interaction in the spirit of dick-fighting, and there has been no discussion of any important point. Don't you see that as a missed opportunity?
Oh! it's the arrogant stupidity from a misguided person that is obviously intelligent and persistent.
ok ok
This organization was created in 2007 and is populated with credentialed architects and engineers. What ever your credentials are (and no, assuming you are a fren, you do not want to reveal this online because of the cancel culture we are in, simply posting here may be cause for some people to cause you problems at work) we can reasonably agree that credentialled architects are able to comment on building that were standing one day, and not standing the next. https://www.ae911truth.org/
in this discussion we do not stray into why things happened. There are all kinds of potential why's and so few hard facts to ground that conversation. So let's stick with just what did happen and what evidence substantiates that understanding of events.
we take one issue at a time. This way we can fully explore a single issue while preventing the confusion of issues.
The first issue, is free fall in WTC 7. Please review this page. Please excuse my prior comments on freefall, I was saying them from memory. We will use what is printed here as the starting point for this discussion.
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/free-fall-acceleration