Judging by the quality of his paintings, probably. It's mediocre at best, and it's modern art, which is complete garbage as a genre. Dogs Playing Poker on velvet is better. The only reason someone in their right mind would pay $500K for one if his paintings is because his name is on it.
Judging by the quality of his paintings, probably. It's mediocre at best, and it's modern art, which is complete garbage as a genre. Dogs Playing Poker on velvet is better. The only reason someone in their right mind would pay $500K for one if his paintings is because his name is on it.
He's to lazy to work, probably just hires drug addicts.