I would prefer that, yes, I think we have seen how unfit the civilian law process is. The military will have clear prima-facie evidence to rule on, there can be no argument in the case of Milley anyway, he admitted informing a putatively hostile foreign power that he would mutiny against the chain of command when he told China he would warn them of action Trump might take and would ignore the order, he is TOAST in a military tribunal for saying that, and who can argue? it's not like he had an unconstitutional order to reject, he was talking about legitimate orders he would ignore. Clear case of lock-him-up I'd say. My only fear is I might not get to watch him cry about it live on TV