Are we wrong to take this structure, this nation and want to fight for it? No. A resounding No.
I would suggest it is more like a "Yes, and also a resounding No."
The idea that the Constitution can in any way give you, or even protect your Rights is the fraud. A Constitution can't say anything about your Rights at all, they are your Rights, they are inalienable, they can't be taken away. The fact that we have Laws that attempt to take them away is the fraud. The Constitution plays cover for those Laws, justifying an entirely fraudulent legal system in it's pretense.
In addition, the Constitution itself takes away our Rights. Just look at the fifth amendment. It is full of denial of our inalienable Rights. It lays claim to OUR JURISDICTION, while at the same time proclaiming the opposite. Since these Rights violations are built in to the Constitution itself, that also perpetuates the fraud, because the only way to "get back our Rights" (which is impossible, because they can't be taken away in the first place) is by further Constitutional Amendment, or complete Revolution.
We thus live in a fraudulent system, designed to justify a fraudulent view of what law is, pretending to be about "protecting Rights", when in fact it is all about taking them away slowly but surely, until none exist.
You think we still have freedom of speech? Wrong, we don't. There are numerous "illegal acts of speech," not the least of which is talking about actual Revolution (i.e. planning a real revolution) against the Tyranny of our government and its Constitution. You think we still have freedom to bear arms? Wrong, we don't. There are numerous systems in place to reduce gun ownership (over taxation, price fixing, difficult licensing, impossible licensing in some states for many people, etc.). It should be that everyone has a gun, and is trained to use it. Instead it's more like 10% of the population has one (at least one), and much less than that know how to use it properly. If it came to actual war against the US Govt. (The purpose of 2A) we wouldn't stand a chance. The weapons we can buy are trivial next to what the Govt. has at their disposal. A real civil war of We The People v. the U. S. Govt. would be trivially won by the Govt. in a New York minute. Our access to weapons is just too limited.
We live in the illusion of "protected rights." It's all a farce, an act, a play. That is why the Military is truly the only way. What we are doing now is continuing the play so that the people will think that they have taken back their government, but in reality, the Military had to have stepped in and taken care of everything already.
I would suggest it is more like a "Yes, and also a resounding No."
The idea that the Constitution can in any way give you, or even protect your Rights is the fraud. A Constitution can't say anything about your Rights at all, they are your Rights, they are inalienable, they can't be taken away. The fact that we have Laws that attempt to take them away is the fraud. The Constitution plays cover for those Laws, justifying an entirely fraudulent legal system in it's pretense.
In addition, the Constitution itself takes away our Rights. Just look at the fifth amendment. It is full of denial of our inalienable Rights. It lays claim to OUR JURISDICTION, while at the same time proclaiming the opposite. Since these Rights violations are built in to the Constitution itself, that also perpetuates the fraud, because the only way to "get back our Rights" (which is impossible, because they can't be taken away in the first place) is by further Constitutional Amendment, or complete Revolution.
We thus live in a fraudulent system, designed to justify a fraudulent view of what law is, pretending to be about "protecting Rights", when in fact it is all about taking them away slowly but surely, until none exist.
You think we still have freedom of speech? Wrong, we don't. There are numerous "illegal acts of speech," not the least of which is talking about actual Revolution (i.e. planning a real revolution) against the Tyranny of our government and its Constitution. You think we still have freedom to bear arms? Wrong, we don't. There are numerous systems in place to reduce gun ownership (over taxation, price fixing, difficult licensing, impossible licensing in some states for many people, etc.). It should be that everyone has a gun, and is trained to use it. Instead it's more like 10% of the population has one (at least one), and much less than that know how to use it properly. If it came to actual war against the US Govt. (The purpose of 2A) we wouldn't stand a chance. The weapons we can buy are trivial next to what the Govt. has at their disposal. A real civil war of We The People v. the U. S. Govt. would be trivially won by the Govt. in a New York minute. Our access to weapons is just too limited.
We live in the illusion of "protected rights." It's all a farce, an act, a play. That is why the Military is truly the only way. What we are doing now is continuing the play so that the people will think that they have taken back their government, but in reality, the Military had to have stepped in and taken care of everything already.