Great speech by Tucker Carlson on abortion and courage: "If you're afraid of dying, you're doing it wrong"
(twitter.com)
✝️ Sacrifice No Child!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (101)
sorted by:
If you're removing the fetus from the mother, how is that not directly intending the death of it?
Abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy. That's it. If it's a fetus, and you deliberately remove it from the mother, no matter the reason, it's an abortion.
Trying to manipulate language into rationalizing the end of the life of a fetus is nothing less than what pro-choice people do when they talk about how fetuses don't feel pain at certain ages, therefore the fetus is not a person. Or that if a fetus can't survive outside the mother, it's a parasite and not a person.
Again, all you're doing is justifying the death of a living entity.
How is this any different than abortions due to the pregnancy putting the mother's life in danger, such as with pre-eclampsia?
In those situations, the primary intent is to save the mother, not to kill the baby. If there was no other way to save the mother, then what is the difference?
Please ignore that last message. I had your post confused with another. I apologize for that.
Yes, I agree 100%. If pre-eclampsia could be treated without termination, obviously that should be done. If you had met a mother with pre-eclampsia, you would most likely see that they desperately want to keep the baby.
Pre-eclampsia kills around 70,000 women each year. It's one of the most common causes of maternal death.
But going back to the original conversation, how is that situation different than ectopic pregnancy terminations?