I dug through some of Trump's other trips this year and the specific pattern I suspected didn't match..
And really, who cares who Q is? Not sure that it matters other than for the fun of knowing.
Agree that it has to be a team involved. But maybe a good amount of imprecision is allowed for? Like a bowling lane with bumpers? We know that Q team adapts their messaging based on whether anons are absorbing certain clues (I don't have the drop handy but I think Q quotes an anon who summarizes that).
Maybe Scavino gets a general topic or message to communicate and drops things until he finds a pattern that anons pick up on?
I want to emphasize my deep respect for your intelligence fren. Just throwing out the immediate unfiltered thoughts when I read your comment. My "2 cents" or my 0.0000001 cents with inflation factored in.
Thx fren. I treasure the time spent with you and other anons as we dissect this massive puzzle.
Regarding the bowling analogy, it was just my own way of expressing that comms could probably be quite sloppy and still be highly effective as long as the ball got to the end of the lane and hit a few pins. Didn't realize it tied into bowling shoes or anything else!
I dug through some of Trump's other trips this year and the specific pattern I suspected didn't match..
And really, who cares who Q is? Not sure that it matters other than for the fun of knowing.
Agree that it has to be a team involved. But maybe a good amount of imprecision is allowed for? Like a bowling lane with bumpers? We know that Q team adapts their messaging based on whether anons are absorbing certain clues (I don't have the drop handy but I think Q quotes an anon who summarizes that).
Maybe Scavino gets a general topic or message to communicate and drops things until he finds a pattern that anons pick up on?
I want to emphasize my deep respect for your intelligence fren. Just throwing out the immediate unfiltered thoughts when I read your comment. My "2 cents" or my 0.0000001 cents with inflation factored in.
Thx fren. I treasure the time spent with you and other anons as we dissect this massive puzzle.
Regarding the bowling analogy, it was just my own way of expressing that comms could probably be quite sloppy and still be highly effective as long as the ball got to the end of the lane and hit a few pins. Didn't realize it tied into bowling shoes or anything else!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse45/47751356771/
Ya I kind of remember that bowling lane thing. Didn't the bowling shoes have 17 on them or something?