This is why you don't let children choose their gender
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
The money has no intrinsic value, the Oreos have real intrinsic value. It seems to me the child is making the best choice here. What case is trying to be made?
I don't think there are many children that would "choose" a gender other than the one they are born with without prompting. Lots and lots of prompting:
If you just let a child choose who they are without trying to shove it down their throats (brainwashing), children will just be themselves. The problem is not in letting children choose who they want to be, the problem is in believing that the adults have it figured out over the children. In the case of the video in the OP we think the child isn't getting it. It is the adult who isn't getting it. The child fully understands what has real value. It is the adult who has been brainwashed to believe the Illusion is true.
Money is used for goods and services.
As I said:
Just because lots and lots of adults have been brainwashed, doesn't make it not brainwashing. It is Rockefeller and Rothschild (and their cronies) who not only own all corporations in the world, they also created the money everyone uses for all transactions.
After they created the Federal Reserve Note in 1913, they forced everyone to use their illusionary money by forcing through the Income Tax amendment in 1916. This income tax goes directly to the Fed. It has nothing to do with the US Govt.
The Grand Illusion permeates everything, every law, every piece of propaganda, every movie, but most importantly, income tax. Because everyone has to give a big chunk of their funny money to the Fed every year, this forces everyone to believe that something has value, even though it has none. By this method, they control and benefit from every single transaction made, world wide.
No. This kid just loves sugar. My 4-year-old will pick the money over the Oreos so he can buy toys instead. He doesn’t care how much money it is, he just knows money can give him the opportunity to get the stuff he wants. Kids don’t even understand their choices half the time and get upset when they figure out they made the “wrong” choice.
Any child that would choose money over oreos has obviously been "taught the value of money." In such a case, I suggest perhaps it is the parent that trained that child that may need to learn something about money.
Money has zero actual value in and of itself. The money we use was created specifically so that the PTB could control all economic decisions. In order to ensure they could exert that control they forced everyone to use their "money" by creating income tax which is the only way that fiat money can be convincing enough, and then by brainwashing everyone to believe it was the best way, by controlling all economic education and research, thus creating all the "experts" to reinforce the false belief. They literally created the belief most people have in their money specifically to, through that belief, rule the world.
It's The Grand Illusion. The child may "just love sugar," but that is because sugar has intrinsic value. It has a real effect on the Universe (a chemical reaction). Money (Federal Reserve notes) has an illusionary effect, it isn't real. It is motivated and controlled completely by a false belief, i.e. a belief in something that doesn't actually exist (has no real causal effect on the universe) and exists only in the heads of the brainwashed.
Saying money is "real" because it can be used to buy things is akin to saying that Unicorns are "real" because you can swap stories about them. No. Unicorn stories exist, but unicorns themselves don't have any real interaction with the rest of the Universe. Its reality only exists in the minds of those who have been made to believe in their realness through the stories themselves, i.e. those who have been brainwashed. They may find value in "swapping stories" about Unicorns, and they may even trade something of real value for that story, but that doesn't make the Unicorns themselves real (have a real causal input into the universe). Such story swapping only reinforces the belief, which is "valuable" to the story swappers, but it doesn't give Unicorns reality or value in and of themselves.
If you were to force people to give Unicorn stories to the Fed once a year or be jailed, Unicorn stories would have "value" in the sense that they "buy you another year of freedom," but that is only because of the coercion, the scam itself. If we used Unicorn stories instead of Federal Reserve notes as "income tax" people would do whatever they could to gain enough Unicorn stories to keep themselves out of jail, but it wouldn't make Unicorns themselves real.
Oreos have a real causal input into the Universe. It thus has real value. Money has none. If you take away income tax (which is thievery, a protection racket), the Illusion completely collapses, and the money we use instantly shows itself as worthless. Not a single person would use it, the Illusion would be revealed, and everyone would choose the Oreos, because the Oreos have intrinsic value and the Federal Reserve Notes do not.