Bravo to this brave woman! If look at the only video the FBI has released of the CC footage of the seconds leading up to impact and the impact itself frame by frame, you can clearly see it was a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11. But this really doesn't matter because everyone involved will be dead before any of the truth of that day sees a courtroom. We are out 60 years from the JFK assassination and even Trump refused to disclose what we all know about that fateful day!
Not a cruise missile and the video is very blurry, due to exposure smear. Far too large for that. No cruise missile files that close to the ground. Wreckage was found, consistent with the airplane being a 757. The flight was tracked by radar from its origin at the airport. The collision was witnessed by a person who was flying above at the time. What you claim to know is only fantasy.
And what are you to think it was a 747, when it was a 757? It wasn't "parallel" to the ground. The wings clipped the top off a streetlight. It was in a shallow dive. That sort of flying happens all the time; they are called take-offs and landings.
I am an aeronautical engineer with 40 years experience at the Boeing Company, and am familiar with its product line and product capabilities. Do you want to give me lessons?
Bravo to this brave woman! If look at the only video the FBI has released of the CC footage of the seconds leading up to impact and the impact itself frame by frame, you can clearly see it was a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11. But this really doesn't matter because everyone involved will be dead before any of the truth of that day sees a courtroom. We are out 60 years from the JFK assassination and even Trump refused to disclose what we all know about that fateful day!
Not a cruise missile and the video is very blurry, due to exposure smear. Far too large for that. No cruise missile files that close to the ground. Wreckage was found, consistent with the airplane being a 757. The flight was tracked by radar from its origin at the airport. The collision was witnessed by a person who was flying above at the time. What you claim to know is only fantasy.
You're an idiot if you believe a 747 could fly parallel to the ground like that at those speeds they said it was flying at.
And what are you to think it was a 747, when it was a 757? It wasn't "parallel" to the ground. The wings clipped the top off a streetlight. It was in a shallow dive. That sort of flying happens all the time; they are called take-offs and landings.
I am an aeronautical engineer with 40 years experience at the Boeing Company, and am familiar with its product line and product capabilities. Do you want to give me lessons?