Bravo to this brave woman! If look at the only video the FBI has released of the CC footage of the seconds leading up to impact and the impact itself frame by frame, you can clearly see it was a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11. But this really doesn't matter because everyone involved will be dead before any of the truth of that day sees a courtroom. We are out 60 years from the JFK assassination and even Trump refused to disclose what we all know about that fateful day!
Not a cruise missile and the video is very blurry, due to exposure smear. Far too large for that. No cruise missile files that close to the ground. Wreckage was found, consistent with the airplane being a 757. The flight was tracked by radar from its origin at the airport. The collision was witnessed by a person who was flying above at the time. What you claim to know is only fantasy.
You personally know the size of every cruise missile in existence? A missile couldn't be built to match the size of a Boeing? A Boeing cannot fly that close to the ground going that speed...a cruise missile for sure can! Did you see the radar signature? Were you there or did you just hear about that bit of fantasy on CNN? Did you personally interview the ONE person that saw the Boeing that hit? Knowing what I know about aircraft after having been in the industry for 40 years...there was no airplane that hit the Pentagon and it takes far more faith in your fantasy to believe that to believe we were lied to...
We're not talking about imaginary missiles. The largest operational cruise missile currently is the AGM-86, which were build at the plant where I worked. I saw inert fuselages in a transportation corridor in another building and became quite familiar with their size and shape. Far too small to do the trick---and I continue to repeat, there is POSITIVE eyewitness identification of the airliner. In effect, there was a "missile" built to match the size of a Boeing 757---but it was a Boeing 757. It is clear that you do not personally know the size of every cruise missile in existence.
There is nothing to prevent the airplane from flying that close to the ground, especially when it is in a shallow dive. Where did you get your aeronautical engineering degree? I have 3 of them from the University of Washington. The 757 crash speed was 550 mph (maximum specification speed is 571 mph, but that is under its own power only, not in a dive). The Land World Speed record (wheeled vehicle) is 760 mph. A cruise missile wouldn't fly that low because it would be in danger of hitting ground clutter before it got to the target.
The Wikipedia article on American Airlines Flight 77 has a map of the radar ground track. Or are you going full-paranoid-denialist and refuse any evidence that you haven't seen personally? And even evidence that you can see? Why would you even bother to argue over this? It indicates to me that you are flailing to find a case.
So, no witnesses means nothing happened? How many traffic accidents were you in a position to see and know what you were seeing. How do you know that it was only one person who saw anything? There were multiple witnesses, including one that was airborne.
My friend, what company were you in and what did you do? I worked for Boeing and was familiar with airplane size, construction, and performance, as well as with cruise missiles. You know less than you think you know.
Take a look at yourself. You are simply denying all the evidence---period. Anyone doing careful metrology of the image will see that the shape was far too large to be a missile---and a missile could never have produced so much damage with no explosion. The tip-off is your pathetic appeal to imagination ("a missile couldn't be built to match the size of a Boeing?"). This is the real world and we have to cope with what is real in this world. Not invoke imaginary worlds. (The largest cruise missile we have ever built was the SM-62 "Snark," but it was pulled out of service in 1961 because it was less accurate than an ICBM and only 5 museum examples exist today.)
It's obvious that you are buying into the government narrative about what happened that day. Sometimes people can have too much education and not enough real life experience and this produces overeducated fools like yourself.
Assuming you are drinking the entirety of the governments Koolaid, how do you explain the unconventionally unexplainable collapse of WTC7? And with regard to WTC7, if I give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you DON'T believe the ridiculous government/NIST conclusion that the freefall collapse of WTC7 occurred due to a few isolated fires created by WTC1 and WTC2, my reasoned question is if the insider culprits responsible for WTC7 controlled demolition were willing to go to those lengths to bring that building down as well as WTC1 and WTC2, how in the world can you not imagine the lengths they would go to fake a Boeing hitting the Pentagon? With unlimited resources what lengths could our government go to. Additional questions arise as well. For instance, why are you discounting the testimony of the individuals who said they saw NO airplane parts, luggage, bodies or passenger seating (which pairs exactly with any and all photos I have ever seen of the aftermath)? This contradicts the testimony of those people you harken to. How do you explain no landing gear or core engine parts, no tail, etc. I have never seen a large jet aircraft crash...no matter how destroyed on impact that didn't leave some recognizable part identifying it as indeed a large airliner! How do you explain the video recording that started our dialogue is the only video of that incident the government has allowed to be seen? The Pentagon is the most secure structure in the United States and every square inch of that building is surveilled. How is it that the FBI confiscated all the videos and will not release them? Why is this?
I have 35 years experience flying jet aircraft. Based on the one video released, I can 100% guarantee you that there isn't a pilot alive that could have centerpunched the building at that speed and mere feet from the ground over a distance of what looked like at least several hundred yards to impact. And assuming there is a skilled pilot who could fly that distance just feet off the ground at close to the speed of sound, to keep the aircraft from hitting the ground before it reached the Pentagon would have been nothing shy of amazing! I ask you personally, have you ever tried to fly a small Cessna at altitude, by hand and maintain said altitude within just a few feet for any period of time? I have many hours of instructing under my belt as well and I know how impossible this is for any pilot especially for an individual with no real world piloting experience like the so called "terrorists!" Those individuals supposedly had NO real world experience hand flying a large Boeing! Dude the whole narrative is absurd to say the least and it just shows how gullible some people are and the lack of critical thinking when it comes to twisting their own natural logic into making it fit the most suspect government/media narrative!
But why stop here? If you are such an expert on the Boeing aircraft, then you know what is in the nose of a Boeing airplane right? First off, it houses the radome and avionics equipment and the nose itself is made of lightweight composite material so as to not affect the operation of the weather radar system. After that it's basically a hollow metal tube. Now from what I understand, the walls of the Pentagon were made of at least 3 feet of rebar reinforced concrete. Of course coming from our government, who knows if this is even the case, but assuming it is, how could a basically hollow aircraft tube structure made of composite and lightweight aluminum material center punch a perfect 12' diameter hole in solid concrete? And then we are to believe that the actual parts of the plane (i.e. the engines) that could have done this kind of damage...DIDN'T? There was no indication that the engines hit the building at all...in fact there was no evidence that there were any jet engines at all!
I could go on, but you might be an AI bot for all I know. In any case, it definitely takes more faith to believe in your fantasy world than it does to believe that we have actually been severely lied to about the worst terrorist attack (pre Covid of course) ever to occur on US soil. As long as people like you keep spreading the government lies, we will never get to the truth and the families of the victims will continue to suffer not knowing the truth...shame on you!
Bravo to this brave woman! If look at the only video the FBI has released of the CC footage of the seconds leading up to impact and the impact itself frame by frame, you can clearly see it was a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11. But this really doesn't matter because everyone involved will be dead before any of the truth of that day sees a courtroom. We are out 60 years from the JFK assassination and even Trump refused to disclose what we all know about that fateful day!
Not a cruise missile and the video is very blurry, due to exposure smear. Far too large for that. No cruise missile files that close to the ground. Wreckage was found, consistent with the airplane being a 757. The flight was tracked by radar from its origin at the airport. The collision was witnessed by a person who was flying above at the time. What you claim to know is only fantasy.
You personally know the size of every cruise missile in existence? A missile couldn't be built to match the size of a Boeing? A Boeing cannot fly that close to the ground going that speed...a cruise missile for sure can! Did you see the radar signature? Were you there or did you just hear about that bit of fantasy on CNN? Did you personally interview the ONE person that saw the Boeing that hit? Knowing what I know about aircraft after having been in the industry for 40 years...there was no airplane that hit the Pentagon and it takes far more faith in your fantasy to believe that to believe we were lied to...
We're not talking about imaginary missiles. The largest operational cruise missile currently is the AGM-86, which were build at the plant where I worked. I saw inert fuselages in a transportation corridor in another building and became quite familiar with their size and shape. Far too small to do the trick---and I continue to repeat, there is POSITIVE eyewitness identification of the airliner. In effect, there was a "missile" built to match the size of a Boeing 757---but it was a Boeing 757. It is clear that you do not personally know the size of every cruise missile in existence.
There is nothing to prevent the airplane from flying that close to the ground, especially when it is in a shallow dive. Where did you get your aeronautical engineering degree? I have 3 of them from the University of Washington. The 757 crash speed was 550 mph (maximum specification speed is 571 mph, but that is under its own power only, not in a dive). The Land World Speed record (wheeled vehicle) is 760 mph. A cruise missile wouldn't fly that low because it would be in danger of hitting ground clutter before it got to the target.
The Wikipedia article on American Airlines Flight 77 has a map of the radar ground track. Or are you going full-paranoid-denialist and refuse any evidence that you haven't seen personally? And even evidence that you can see? Why would you even bother to argue over this? It indicates to me that you are flailing to find a case.
So, no witnesses means nothing happened? How many traffic accidents were you in a position to see and know what you were seeing. How do you know that it was only one person who saw anything? There were multiple witnesses, including one that was airborne.
My friend, what company were you in and what did you do? I worked for Boeing and was familiar with airplane size, construction, and performance, as well as with cruise missiles. You know less than you think you know.
Take a look at yourself. You are simply denying all the evidence---period. Anyone doing careful metrology of the image will see that the shape was far too large to be a missile---and a missile could never have produced so much damage with no explosion. The tip-off is your pathetic appeal to imagination ("a missile couldn't be built to match the size of a Boeing?"). This is the real world and we have to cope with what is real in this world. Not invoke imaginary worlds. (The largest cruise missile we have ever built was the SM-62 "Snark," but it was pulled out of service in 1961 because it was less accurate than an ICBM and only 5 museum examples exist today.)
It's obvious that you are buying into the government narrative about what happened that day. Sometimes people can have too much education and not enough real life experience and this produces overeducated fools like yourself.
Assuming you are drinking the entirety of the governments Koolaid, how do you explain the unconventionally unexplainable collapse of WTC7? And with regard to WTC7, if I give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you DON'T believe the ridiculous government/NIST conclusion that the freefall collapse of WTC7 occurred due to a few isolated fires created by WTC1 and WTC2, my reasoned question is if the insider culprits responsible for WTC7 controlled demolition were willing to go to those lengths to bring that building down as well as WTC1 and WTC2, how in the world can you not imagine the lengths they would go to fake a Boeing hitting the Pentagon? With unlimited resources what lengths could our government go to. Additional questions arise as well. For instance, why are you discounting the testimony of the individuals who said they saw NO airplane parts, luggage, bodies or passenger seating (which pairs exactly with any and all photos I have ever seen of the aftermath)? This contradicts the testimony of those people you harken to. How do you explain no landing gear or core engine parts, no tail, etc. I have never seen a large jet aircraft crash...no matter how destroyed on impact that didn't leave some recognizable part identifying it as indeed a large airliner! How do you explain the video recording that started our dialogue is the only video of that incident the government has allowed to be seen? The Pentagon is the most secure structure in the United States and every square inch of that building is surveilled. How is it that the FBI confiscated all the videos and will not release them? Why is this?
I have 35 years experience flying jet aircraft. Based on the one video released, I can 100% guarantee you that there isn't a pilot alive that could have centerpunched the building at that speed and mere feet from the ground over a distance of what looked like at least several hundred yards to impact. And assuming there is a skilled pilot who could fly that distance just feet off the ground at close to the speed of sound, to keep the aircraft from hitting the ground before it reached the Pentagon would have been nothing shy of amazing! I ask you personally, have you ever tried to fly a small Cessna at altitude, by hand and maintain said altitude within just a few feet for any period of time? I have many hours of instructing under my belt as well and I know how impossible this is for any pilot especially for an individual with no real world piloting experience like the so called "terrorists!" Those individuals supposedly had NO real world experience hand flying a large Boeing! Dude the whole narrative is absurd to say the least and it just shows how gullible some people are and the lack of critical thinking when it comes to twisting their own natural logic into making it fit the most suspect government/media narrative!
But why stop here? If you are such an expert on the Boeing aircraft, then you know what is in the nose of a Boeing airplane right? First off, it houses the radome and avionics equipment and the nose itself is made of lightweight composite material so as to not affect the operation of the weather radar system. After that it's basically a hollow metal tube. Now from what I understand, the walls of the Pentagon were made of at least 3 feet of rebar reinforced concrete. Of course coming from our government, who knows if this is even the case, but assuming it is, how could a basically hollow aircraft tube structure made of composite and lightweight aluminum material center punch a perfect 12' diameter hole in solid concrete? And then we are to believe that the actual parts of the plane (i.e. the engines) that could have done this kind of damage...DIDN'T? There was no indication that the engines hit the building at all...in fact there was no evidence that there were any jet engines at all!
I could go on, but you might be an AI bot for all I know. In any case, it definitely takes more faith to believe in your fantasy world than it does to believe that we have actually been severely lied to about the worst terrorist attack (pre Covid of course) ever to occur on US soil. As long as people like you keep spreading the government lies, we will never get to the truth and the families of the victims will continue to suffer not knowing the truth...shame on you!