PPT, you're right of course -- way undetectable indeed.
I've been watching this campaign unfold (be paid for) for about 9 months and wondered where it was going. This WEF vid is a good possible explanation.
PFAS is in the stage where a mass of explainer articles ("What You Need to Know about PFAS") are slowly but steadily being seeded to low-information outlets.
If you can stomach the patronizing Karen tone, the videos embedded in these two pages give a good idea of the stance ("be very concerned" ... "It's going to be very expensive.")
PPT, you're right of course -- way undetectable indeed.
I've been watching this campaign unfold (be paid for) for about 9 months and wondered where it was going. This WEF vid is a good possible explanation.
PFAS is in the stage where a mass of explainer articles ("What You Need to Know about PFAS") are slowly but steadily being seeded to low-information outlets.
If you can stomach the patronizing Karen tone, the videos embedded in these two pages give a good idea of the stance ("be very concerned" ... "It's going to be very expensive.")
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/14/health/pfas-water-filters-wellness/index.html
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/wis-to-better-understand-scope-of-pfas-contamination-in-drinking-water-by-2024/ar-AA1gXYnu
I like to run a news search in PFAS every so often and see where the narrative's at and who's running headlines.