9 out of 10 plane crashes - targeted kills. What's the background on this?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
There are thousands of crashes yearly in the US. It's absurd to think 70% are targeted. https://www.ntsb.gov/Pages/monthly.aspx I think there is a missing caveat: are the targeted people white hats or black hats targeted by other black hats, e.g. certain acquaintances of the Clintons.
The most interesting thing in this spreadsheet is that, in general, accident numbers are going down over time, but fatalities are fairly level. Private planes are much more dangerous than private cars.
Small planes crash more often for a variety of reasons. For instance, the pilots may not have the practice. Cessnas have a suspiciously high number of incidents where water in the fuel caused power loss. https://www.wsbtv.com/news/2-investigates/pilots-say-this-one-problem-is-causing-hundreds-small-planes-crash-faa-wont-fix-it/7MVJ3F42EVB75AGBSGT6IU7QOI/#:~:text=Gray%20dug%20through%20decades%20of%20NTSB%20reports%20and,found%20in%20the%20fuel.%20Eight%20were%20fatal%20crashes.
Per Q drops: https://qalerts.app/?q=%23259%7C%23463%7C%23525
Yes, I know. I read it years ago. Since then there have been thousands of crashes and hundreds of fatalities. And that's just in the US. And are we to believe that 70% were deliberately done to kill one or two passengers? If so, it would be possible by now to compile such a list of passengers that we could clearly see a pattern of connections. We ought to be noticing some effect on whichever group is being targeted, or even if there is more than one set of antagonists.