It's a way to start discrediting the victim early incase the abductor was one of theirs. She was captured and held somewhere - that's an abduction.... you don't need permission to use words that define the situation.
The 'news' is already protected from liability anymore with the obama's cancellation of the Smith-Mundt (sp?) act.
Great question. Wonder if it was by somebody known publicly?
It's a way to start discrediting the victim early incase the abductor was one of theirs. She was captured and held somewhere - that's an abduction.... you don't need permission to use words that define the situation.
The 'news' is already protected from liability anymore with the obama's cancellation of the Smith-Mundt (sp?) act.