Welcome to October 2023! We will finally get to check out the ultimate date fag. Over the years there’s been multiple conversations about the first post. Not only did Q give a date that Hillary would be arrested but he also gave a specific day of the week. (Personally, I think Hillary is already at Gitmo, if she is even still alive. But I believe this refers to when the public actually sees the arrest happen.) Every time October 30 gets close we’d always think if the arrest is going to happen this year then why did he put Monday in the post? Well, this is the year that October 30 falls on a Monday. Do I think it’s going to happen this year? Not really. It’s possible, but I think there’s way too much that still needs to take place in order for the public narrative to be presented of Hillary being arrested. However, it’s way too exciting of a possibility not to watch and see what happens. Thoughts?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
And this was not Q - this was another poster to which Q was replying.
Someone always points this out. But he reposted the statement WITHOUT REFUTING IT. That's essentially the same as Q posting it himself.
Think what happens when Trump reposts something from a Q account without comment, like WWG1WGA. It's 100% regarded as Trump endorsing the message.
So it I do a reply all at work, to someone else's email, and put forth my views that may or may not align with that person's, if I do not refute it explicitly, then I am endorsing what they said word for word. Just think about it the next time you are in that situation and have a good laugh!
I hope you understand the difference between Trump reposting something, and Trump replying to something.