DJT's Truth account has been posting a lot today. Much of it is criticism re: Ron DeSanctimonious, etc, but about 2 hours ago, he truthed and retruthed a small flurry of "Trump for Speaker" truths.
Knowing that DJT is a master of populist 5G warfare, we can understand that he has reasons for doing this, whether or not he considers this as a real possibility, including (potentially) increasing his profile, stirring up the hornets' nest in DC, and moving a variety of narratives.
Dasting.
Trump TRUTH
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111179710276499538
3min Clip of Bannon Asking people to consider Trump for Speaker
Trump TRUTH
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111179709232101277
Content: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/10/wayne-root-trump-house-speaker-again-whether-he/
WAYNE ROOT: Trump for House Speaker- Again? Whether He Wants It, or Not, Here’s the Idea That Exposes All the RINOS and Changes Congress Forever!
Trump RETRUTH
https://truthsocial.com/@RepMTG/posts/111177115014378628
MTG: I’m supporting President Donald J. Trump to be the next Speaker of the House!
He has a proven four year record of putting America First and implementing the policies the American people want.
CONTENT: America's Real Voice Clip: "Is Speaker Trump a real possibility?"
Trump RETRUTH
https://truthsocial.com/@MTG/posts/111174447970743697
MTG: President Trump is THE LEADER of the Republican Party.
President @realDonaldTrump should be our Speaker!
EDIT: Disclaimer: In recent days, I've generally poopooed the idea of DJT becoming Speaker. I still think that the idea is not very realistic, but it would be foolish to rule out anything, given how many unknowns there really are.
I will say one thing: If DJT WERE to become speaker, it would detonate such a titanic hydro-bomb across the entire world, it would be time to just sit back, and watch the whole thing crumble. I think it could only happen if indeed Patriots are in control of a LOT more than I suspect. The meltdown would be delicious.
That said, either way, I think it's dasting that he has retruthed the idea. Either way, DJT all the way!
You know how BTC is Proof of Work? And Ethereum is Proof of Stake? Instead of burning energy to secure the network, you can lock up tokens and run a node (Proof of Stake.)
Some of the NFT projects (e.g. Super Verse from Elliot Trades (Youtuber)), allow you to also stake (lock up) your NFT's for higher staking rewards of the crypto.
Having certain NFT's is like having a pass in certain ecosystems. My point earlier with it is too early to judge this area is honest. I don't know what to expect, only that it will probably follow the shock and awe of what crypto has done (and it is a baby too.)
Hey, there are lots of scams. I have no problem with your using the word. But I use the word from actually using and understanding the ecosystem (and having been scammed, but maybe with NFT's like 3 times out of 2000 - no exageration, lol). I really like to take part in this, call it a cost of experience.
BTW - NFT's by their nature on non fungible tokens (aka NFT). But now, there are smart contracts where the NFT (e.g. something expensive like a Bored Ape) is locked up and you can buy fractional ownership of one. (Which also give you some of the rights and air drops into their ecosystem. Yeah, most are shit at this point, but many are not.)
Re "new art form" - there has been a continuation and expansion of digital art because of the popularity of NFT's. It took it to a whole new level. Again, at this point it is semantic. My point is expect the unexpected.
Might want to buy a Trump NFT, just in case this whole Q thing is real. ;-)
The whole first paragraph just went way over my head. In concrete terms, what does any of that mean?
Also what’s an “ecosystem”? Is it a video game with premium in-game currency? Something like an exclusive social media group?
Also I’m gonna totally deny the “whole new level” of digital art thing. People have been making absolutely stunning works of digital art for years before NFTs were even an idea, I’m willing to bet you probably just haven’t been in the right circles to be exposed to large quantities of digital art until you got involved with NFTs.
It basically means you should understand the technology you are commenting about.
2nd - see point above.
…
I don’t need to prove myself to you. That’s not why I’m asking these questions. I know enough for a casual understanding, but nothing of the “culture” and jargon, and both of these things are independent of my understanding of “the technology”. Let me tell you, if this stuff I’m asking about isn’t BS, you’re doing an awful job of explaining why it’s worthwhile. I shouldn’t have to be involved with crypto and nfts in order to be able to learn the practical aspects of their supposed benefits. This isn’t like congress where you have to pass a bill to find out what’s in it.
“Art NFTs are a scam”
“No they’re not there’s a whole lot more to it! Ever heard of [systems with non-descriptive names completely niche to this and related fields]?”
“No what’s that”
“You know nothing! I’m not even gonna try to explain!”
I have a lot of respect for effective teachers, and very little for those who obscure their knowledge in an effort to create an exclusive class or a personal feeling of superiority.
I didn't ask you to prove yourself. It would have been nice to meet in the middle. It is a complicated area and you started off sounding like you knew what you were talking about. But you have (apparently) no crypto experience and yet you are commenting on it as if you do. Just got old. No offense.
Here is a short video explaining the differences of POS and POW. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOxTKqIpXHc