When they tell you exactly how they did it, without telling you directly how they did it. *important 9/11 information *
(www.theguardian.com)
🏢 9/11fags 🏢
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
As to the "no final conclusions" part, there was an interesting documentary on a possible option:
A diagram of the extra circuitry required in the plane was displayed on a wall in an Air Force base in the UK. An amateur electronics enthusiast saw the circuit and noticed a flaw so he raised it with his NCO, then an officer and eventually the Commanding Officer. They all pooh-poohed his comments because the circuit had been designed by acknowledged experts in electronics. How could this mere airman know anything?
According to the documentary, it was possible that while everything worked as expected all the components were rated appropriately but if something were delayed then one of the components could overheat because it would be switched on for too long.
I don't get why a powerful family has one of their men flying explosives in a dangerous mission. Like wtf are you doing. Send the peasants.
If you were a bomber pilot during WW2 every mission was a dangerous mission. Your plane was filled up with bombs and was easy prey to any fighters that might intercept you - and then there is the anti-aircraft fire.
The press would have made him a bigger hero, than the yahoo who had his pt boat sunk.