Take it up with God, I guess. He knows much more than you and I do about His creation.
And remember, no objective standard outside of God (any alleged god) and an external revelation to Man (any alleged revelation to Man) exists to be able to accurately claim any sort of moral truth.
Without a god and an external, objective source, nothing we as fallible humans conclude is objectively valid, at least morally. For example, some people think lying is morally ok, even righteous, if it is only a little white-lie. Some think no lying is ok. There is no objectivity here. And this extends all the way up to every moral conundrum and fallible human view.
So frankly, the only position that is absurd is yours, which posits you as the sole arbiter of knowledge and as having ultimate authority in that knowledge. It is a position of extreme ego, where whatever you believe is the ultimate truth, and whatever anyone else says that is contradictory must be wrong because they couldn't possibly know more than you about whatever mystical universal morality you both subscribe to. And then of course anyone who posits that an objective source exists to provide us guidance is just written off immediately without consideration of whether or not the source is real or not. Because God couldn't possibly be real if He disagrees with your moral philosophy, oh great one!
Nice argument.
Take it up with God, I guess. He knows much more than you and I do about His creation.
And remember, no objective standard outside of God (any alleged god) and an external revelation to Man (any alleged revelation to Man) exists to be able to accurately claim any sort of moral truth.
Without a god and an external, objective source, nothing we as fallible humans conclude is objectively valid, at least morally. For example, some people think lying is morally ok, even righteous, if it is only a little white-lie. Some think no lying is ok. There is no objectivity here. And this extends all the way up to every moral conundrum and fallible human view.
So frankly, the only position that is absurd is yours, which posits you as the sole arbiter of knowledge and as having ultimate authority in that knowledge. It is a position of extreme ego, where whatever you believe is the ultimate truth, and whatever anyone else says that is contradictory must be wrong because they couldn't possibly know more than you about whatever mystical universal morality you both subscribe to. And then of course anyone who posits that an objective source exists to provide us guidance is just written off immediately without consideration of whether or not the source is real or not. Because God couldn't possibly be real if He disagrees with your moral philosophy, oh great one!