CBS’s Catherine Herridge Blows Up Jack Smith’s Latest Leak Claiming Trump Discussed “Potentially Sensitive” Nuclear Subs with Foreign National (VIDEO)
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
- CBS SALT? -
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
“According to Pratt’s account, as described by the sources, Pratt told Trump he believed Australia should start buying its submarines from the United States, to which an excited Trump — “leaning” toward Pratt as if to be discreet — then told Pratt two pieces of information about U.S. submarines: the supposed exact number of nuclear warheads they routinely carry, and exactly how close they supposedly can get to a Russian submarine without being detected.” ABC News said.
Pratt reportedly described Trump’s conversation about the subs with 45 people, 6 reporters, 11 Mar-a-Lago employees, 10 Australian officials and 3 former Australian prime ministers, ABC said.
Trump never showed any government documents to Pratt. In fact, according to Pratt, everything Trump told him about the nuclear submarines was already in news reports because of Joe Biden’s negotiations with Australia over a deal for them to purchase nuclear subs from the US.
And they never brought any charges so who fucking cares about this article?
But you should care. Who was trying to convict President Trump in the Court of public Opinion ? yet they want a gag order on President Trump while they leak to the public.
I agree with the point Jack did not charge. it points at Corporate MSM and their claims and incriminates them. Caught in a sting ?
You are so-called corporate MSM also did not report that any charges were filed. So we have a hearsay account that one incident was investigated, no evidence and no charges were brought, and yet somehow this article is supposed to make us angry?
I suspect a sting on leaks that Sessions had mentioned in the past. FISA works both ways.
I am coming from the angle of a sting being done on Corporate MSM Mockingbirds possibly.
The entire premise is idiotic and false off the bat. The number of ICBM an Ohio class submarine can carry is not classified. And the actual amount they carry varies. There is no set number. Not every tube is hot. Or they may all be. So it’s impossible to break the law in the way described.
The detection range is also not a set number. In what conditions? What submarine? What enemy submarine? What speed? What depth? What is bottom depth? Was active sonar being used by enemy sub?
In order to actually convey Top Secret info about detection ranges he would have had to include all of those details. What boat. When it happened. Where it happened. What enemy hull number. And even then; the top secret issue wouldn’t that we were not detected, because that numbers changes constantly. It would be that we got so close to an enemy sub, probably by accident; and nearly caused a collision and international incident.
We don’t need to crawl up the ass of enemy subs. Water is a remarkable transmitter of sound. The hardest part of tracking is keeping range control and staying the established minimum safe distance away in order to avoid collision.
The story sounds like some bullshit made up by some idiot civilian who heard a rumor and just ran with it. And then some idiot prosecutor who wouldn’t know a Russian sub from a Chinese sub ran with it.
And that’s the last thing. We aren’t up the ass of Russian subs anyway. We are up the ass of Chinese submarines. We usually only get near the Russians when they are doing war games because they have a huge area of sea near them wired with sensors. It’s not worth getting our own subs noise signatures captured by Russian surveillance to try to get close to them for sound cuts.
It makes my stomach hurt to read shit this stupid.
Edit- I forgot about start treaty. Most people don’t know this, but the Russians can show up randomly at will at our SSBN bases and demand to see a missile tube. They go right down to the waterfront, they point out a boat, and they say tube 12 or whatever. They put a cone and a light on that tube, and everything is dropped to move the boat to handling shed. They sit in an RV and watch all night to make sure no one moves the cone. I would know. I have had to leave house at midnight because the russians showed up and we have to move the boat.
They get X number of random visits a year. If they pick an empty tube, oh well good luck next time. If they get a full tube, the Russians get to see everything. They pull everything off so they can see the warheads. We are not allowed to invent some new way to carry more warheads without violating the treaty. If we come up with some new missile for the next SSBN, the Russians will get access to that too. Although I hear they are just still using the Trident D5 and the entire point is moot because the Russians already know what’s in them.
We have the same rights for them as well. We conduct surprise inspections in the same way.
Bet you didn’t know that.
Don't waste your breath. This guy never makes any sense with his posts and when you try to argue logical points it goes completely off into the weeds.