Probably for this reason.
- In February 1917 the Soviets took control of Russia.
- Ukraine, which was part of the Russian empire, immediately claimed autonomy from the Soviet take over.
- in October 1917 the Bolsheviks took over Russia and invaded Ukraine.
- November 1917 the Balfour Declaration was created, establishing the nation of Israel.
When the Kazarians (the Rothschilds, etc) saw they would lose their center of operation, they decided to create their own sovereign country.
I do not think this idea has merit.
They didn't "lose" in Russia, or Ukraine. They won completely. Everything that happened there was exactly by design.
The Rothschilds had been trying to create Israel for at least a hundred years before it actually happened. I can't find the reference at the moment, but I found, in the Niles Almanac (1833 I think?) a statement that one of the Rothschilds (I think Nathan himself0 tried to buy Palestine from the Ottomans for some ridiculous amount of money. The Zionist movement itself is noted as beginning around that time. The Zionist movement is attributed to Abraham Mapu who wrote the "inspirational book" around 1850, but I think it began in earnest quite a bit before that time.
Interestingly, Abraham Mapu was the teacher (at Kovno Gymnasium), and noted most important influence in the life of Mark Natanson, who was one of the most important people in the Bolshevik Revolution. Mr. Natanson also happens to have been the uncle and surrogate father for Mr. Alexander Berkman, who was the "attempted assassin" for both Henry Frick (of Carnegie steel) and John D. Rockefeller. As it turns out, in both cases it ended up wiping the slate clean of their respective massacres in the media (Homestead massacre and Ludlow massacre respectively), because if you are "the victim" of a (failed) assassination, the media can sell you as "not a perpetrator."
Alexander Berkman also happens to have been BFFs with Margaret Sanger, who of course was a Rockefeller agent.
There is a GREAT DEAL more to that story, but there is only so much time.
Nothing is what it seems. Everything is controlled opposition, and most importantly:
The House Always Wins.
Frick was a bastard. He was the reason for the 1892 Homestead riot. My maternal great-grandfather was involved in that. He was accused of being one of the group of workers who stuck a bunch of Pinkerton detectives on a raft and sent it out into, I believe, the Mongahela river. It's sank and some of them didn't make it. He had to run out to Montana and live with the Blackfeet for 5 years until the heat died down. My family members are ashamed of that, I am not. The Pinkertons were real bastards also, shooting unarmed workers.
Now I'm going to have to check Andrew Berkman to see how he ties into this. Very interesting.
Whatever you think about Frick and the Homestead situation, it was nothing compared to Rockefeller and the Ludlow situation, which was very similar, though on a much larger scale. Both were "addressed" by Berkman as would be bungling assassin.
Berkman ties into everything, but is not himself a major player (as far as I can tell), except as a helper and propagandist. Berkman and his life partner Emma Goldman were BFFs (and likely lovers) with Margaret Sanger. They were the anarcho-Communists who were the pro Bolshevik revolution propagandists in the United States (as was Sanger). Look up the IWW (wobblies). Everyone involved in that "capitalist opposition movement" had direct ties to Rockefeller or the Bolshevik revolution, or both. The IWW, which organized protests "against the capitalists" and "for the workers" was a master class in how to create a agency of Controlled Opposition.
You can read my report here which shows how Rockefeller created the single corporation that exists (there can be only one, a true monopoly). The next section, hopefully coming out soon, will have a whole lot of stuff on Sanger and Berkman, and the co-creation of Israel and the USSR, both of which were primary intents (along with the United Nations) of the world wars.
That's an amazing report you created. It deserves to be reposted. I'm sure your next section will be just as, or perhaps more interesting. Especially concerning Hillary's idol Sanger. This Berkman seems to be quite a character. The guy who actually shot Frick but couldn't finish the job. Then planned to bomb Rockefeller's place, again not completing the job. What a guy.