Understood. Prove to me all your relations and/or ancestors were good wholesome people. Bet if we go far enough some interesting connections could be made there as well.
I'd be more inclined to listen to that argument if you could demonstrate her hubby still holds those beliefs and works towards their goals.
That would be fair.
Update: To be honest, if she is influenced by her hubby, I'm very confused, as she is against Alphabet Soup agendas, destruction of the family, and Dems in general. Did you even listen to what she had to say, or did you just flippantly throw out the hubby stuff as a knee jerk reaction to seeing her name?
I've heard rumors that her husband is a member of the Pilgrims Society, although I can't immediately verify that. If true, it's rather startling given a list of their "notable members."
Upon deeper digging, I've found claims that variously he and/or his father are members, but as of yet haven't found an original source for said claim. Her husband was, however, a member of the exclusive Bullingdon Club, a secret society based out of Oxford.
If it is true, I'm not sure why she is spouting family values, denouncing pedos, shutting down the Alphabet Soup people, etc.
It would be far from the first time that a puppet has been presented, whether by themselves or others, as on the side of We the People. I'm not going to trust someone simply because they tell me what I'd like to hear.
Are you a researcher or a rumor monger u/McSimply? I'm not sure rumors become you. maybe check out the video and then comment?
Not exactly a rumor-monger when I state it's a rumor that I've yet to personally verify, not trying to pass it off as anything other than that.
To be blunt, Rooks, I find it curious how hard you're promoting Candace in this thread. I used to like and listen to her, but certain words and actions of hers as well as those of the company she keeps set off red flags for me. If I'm going to listen to a commentator, I'll do so with one that I'm reasonably certain isn't a controlled op.
As an aside, I appreciate you spurring me to research her and those connected to her more. Her father-in-law literally went from rags to riches trading in metals, particularly copper, which seems like a possible rabbit hole.
Not too hard, more push back from percevidly narrow minds. Not you, but GAW in general has, IMO, a bad habit of condemning people as Cabal, conspirators, or accomplices, or even complicit with Team Evil, when reality can often be otherwise.
I have a hard time condemning political commentators just because they don't actively go after the cabal. Is it kind of disheartening? Sure.
To me it seems they are still under the apprehension they can still play in the system, which makes them blind to it crumbling all around them.
Doesn't make them evil. Naive for sure, Huberistic, yup. Not awake, for certain. Trying to do good in a world falling apart around them, yup.
I would be interested in additional info on the spouse as/if you find more.
How about, who cares? Does she have to have the background of trump, be a bazillionare to get your attention? does she have to be part of the inner circle of Q? Not sure where you are going with this.
If you are referring to her having more liberal views in her past, and walking away, changing her mind, Fren, you are better than a low quality comment like that.
So what, no one can get smarter with age and experience?
In this case, I thought she gave a good speech. Her lack of understanding and acceptance of Q causes her to make bad calls/judgements as to who/what to believe.
For a normie trying to do good, I think she is doing well dispite lapses in judgement.
Understood. Prove to me all your relations and/or ancestors were good wholesome people. Bet if we go far enough some interesting connections could be made there as well.
I'd be more inclined to listen to that argument if you could demonstrate her hubby still holds those beliefs and works towards their goals.
That would be fair.
Update: To be honest, if she is influenced by her hubby, I'm very confused, as she is against Alphabet Soup agendas, destruction of the family, and Dems in general. Did you even listen to what she had to say, or did you just flippantly throw out the hubby stuff as a knee jerk reaction to seeing her name?
I've heard rumors that her husband is a member of the Pilgrims Society, although I can't immediately verify that. If true, it's rather startling given a list of their "notable members."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilgrims_Society
May want to verify that. If it is true, I'm not sure why she is spouting family values, denouncing pedos, shutting down the Alphabet Soup people, etc.
Are you a researcher or a rumor monger u/McSimply? I'm not sure rumors become you. maybe check out the video and then comment?
Upon deeper digging, I've found claims that variously he and/or his father are members, but as of yet haven't found an original source for said claim. Her husband was, however, a member of the exclusive Bullingdon Club, a secret society based out of Oxford.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2126636/New-Tory-treasurer-funded-sons-membership-Bullingdon-Club.html
It would be far from the first time that a puppet has been presented, whether by themselves or others, as on the side of We the People. I'm not going to trust someone simply because they tell me what I'd like to hear.
Not exactly a rumor-monger when I state it's a rumor that I've yet to personally verify, not trying to pass it off as anything other than that.
To be blunt, Rooks, I find it curious how hard you're promoting Candace in this thread. I used to like and listen to her, but certain words and actions of hers as well as those of the company she keeps set off red flags for me. If I'm going to listen to a commentator, I'll do so with one that I'm reasonably certain isn't a controlled op.
As an aside, I appreciate you spurring me to research her and those connected to her more. Her father-in-law literally went from rags to riches trading in metals, particularly copper, which seems like a possible rabbit hole.
Not too hard, more push back from percevidly narrow minds. Not you, but GAW in general has, IMO, a bad habit of condemning people as Cabal, conspirators, or accomplices, or even complicit with Team Evil, when reality can often be otherwise.
I have a hard time condemning political commentators just because they don't actively go after the cabal. Is it kind of disheartening? Sure. To me it seems they are still under the apprehension they can still play in the system, which makes them blind to it crumbling all around them.
Doesn't make them evil. Naive for sure, Huberistic, yup. Not awake, for certain. Trying to do good in a world falling apart around them, yup.
I would be interested in additional info on the spouse as/if you find more.
Ty for researching.
Whats her originsl claim to fame? Highschool...
How about, who cares? Does she have to have the background of trump, be a bazillionare to get your attention? does she have to be part of the inner circle of Q? Not sure where you are going with this.
If you are referring to her having more liberal views in her past, and walking away, changing her mind, Fren, you are better than a low quality comment like that.
So what, no one can get smarter with age and experience?
Odd circumstances surround her whole life. I wish her the best but trust her not more than needed.
Acceptable.
In this case, I thought she gave a good speech. Her lack of understanding and acceptance of Q causes her to make bad calls/judgements as to who/what to believe. For a normie trying to do good, I think she is doing well dispite lapses in judgement.