McSimply 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the CDC's put out a warning to people in that area that they should monitor themselves for cold-like symptoms.

Source: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/cdc-monitoring-local-residents-cold-like-symptoms-following-crash-semi-carrying-100-cdc-test-monkeys/

They really are desperate.

McSimply 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're absolutely right about that.

"A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel." Proverbs 12:10

"Be thou diligent to know the state of thy flocks, and look well to thy herds." Proverbs 27:23

"Thy righteousness is like the great mountains; thy judgments are a great deep: O Lord, thou preservest man and beast." Psalm 36:6

"For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine." Psalm 50:10-11

"And should not I spare Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more than sixscore thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand; and also much cattle?" Jonah 4:11

McSimply 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't dismiss 30 years of research and a team of Russians with a glib ..freemason reference

That's not the only reason to dismiss it, but as I said it is a serious red flag.

and you don't even try with biglianos life translating..heaven forbid you might discover some truths.

With respect, just because he spent many years of his life translating something doesn't mean that it's true. That the Catholic Church disavowed his work doesn't necessarily lend it credence either, as they've historically persecuted any individual or movement that holds beliefs different from their own, whether or not said beliefs are accurate to the Bible.

The lost gospels tell a story that obviously doesn't fit the pope s and religion agenda and clearly not yours either

I'm familiar enough with them to know that they do not fit with the Old Testament either, which means that they're not of God, as He is always consistent (Isaiah 8:20; Psalm 33:11; Psalm 89:34; Malachi 3:6).

I don't debate as people don't like their illusions destroyed..and this is not the place to do so ..as we are seeing just with the jabbed ..they want to preserve their illusions that governments are their mummy's and looking after them the same way religion does.

Typically, I don't debate people either, but rather just add to discussions by sharing information when it seems relevant. And I can certainly agree that it appears many of the jabbed behave as if they're part of a cult.

When people grow up and learn to save themselves stop believing the agendas laid out for them by religion s and globalists governments it will be a good day

I am glad to see that more and more people are losing trust in the devil-worshipping "elites" and their designated "experts" and are seeking the truth; it really is looking like a Great Awakening.

McSimply 1 point ago +1 / -0

The real meaning of holy spirit is craft that glides over water...referring to nephilim hunting for slaves in their space ships. the word was Roch . It was wrongly translated

By "roch" I presume you are referring to the Hebrew word transliterated as "ruach" which means breath, wind, or spirit. The word "nephilim" literally means giants and refers to human beings of large stature, as people before the Flood were, and as some afterward were, such as Goliath and King Og of Bashan, who was the last of the giants.

The elohim were beings in charge ..there were nine of them.. Yahweh adoni Jehovah etc. The Jews chose one of these to worship. They were not forced to.

Three, not nine. Elohim literally means "gods" in Hebrew; it is the plural of el or eloah, which means god. Elohim is most often used in the Old Testament in reference to God and demonstrates his triune nature, that is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Adonai is also plural and means "my lords" in Hebrew, again referring to God being three who are as one.

Incidentally, God is variously referred to both in the singular and the plural, sometimes in the same sentence (Isaiah 6:8).

Yahweh or Yahveh is the "name" or description of Himself that God revealed to Moses. It stems from the Hebrew root word havah, which means being, as in that He is eternal and causes all things to be.

Jehovah is an alternate transliteration of Yahweh/Yahveh into English.

You're correct that the Jews were not forced to worship God, He always gave them a choice.

The bible is a collection of stories. A lot about the annanuki and nephilim .the gods Jehovah adoni Yahweh etc are the Annanuki who pretended they were gods and our creators. They messed with our DNA but did not create us. The nummo did that and gave us souls as they had them and we were created from them. The aliens live a long time but do not have souls. They do not reincarnate

It sounds like you're attempting to mix the Bible with mythology from the Sumerians, Akkadians, and people from the Far East. They don't correlate.

Biglino who laboured for years to transcribe and clean up the bible of its errors additions etc by the pope and sacked when the translation was not what the agenda of the Catholic church wanted.

I wasn't familiar with Biglino until you mentioned him so I just looked him up. If he was attempting to rewrite the Bible, that's a fatal mistake, whether the Catholic Church agreed with it or not.

All references to reincarnation were removed at council of Nicea along with the lost gospels etc

Writings outside of the Bible from the 1st and 2nd centuries indicate that it was already generally accepted that there were only four legitimate gospels, namely the ones that are in the Bible. There are no references to reincarnation in any of the oldest surviving copies of the New Testament, nor is it even hinted at in the Old Testament. The Bible is clear that it's not God's plan to reincarnate people, but to resurrect them and give them eternal life.

Then you have Fomenco russian mathematician who discovered 1000 years were added to our history...and that this practice of adding and subtracting went on to suit agendas all the time by popes and kings. Several volumes have been translated into English

Again, wasn't familiar with Fomenko so I just looked him up. Apparently, he based his work on the writings of Morozov, who was a Freemason, which is an immediate red flag.

Regardless, although we don't agree, I hope for the very best for you, fren. God bless.

McSimply 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically, it's still a matter of choice. Anyone who accepts the mark of the beast evidently isn't going to repent (Revelation 14:9-11).

The unpardonable sin isn't denouncing the Holy Spirit per se, but rather persistently rejecting the Holy Spirit and His influence. This can be seen in Matthew 12:22-32, Mark 3:22-30, and Luke 12:10.

In short, when Jesus performed miracles, He didn't do it by His own power. Rather, it was the Holy Spirit working through Him. The Pharisees didn't want to accept Him as the Messiah, but they couldn't deny the miracles, so they instead claimed that He was performing miracles by the power of the Devil. Jesus refuted this and also informed them that although they were slandering HIm, that was forgivable. However, if they refused to acknowledge the workings of the Holy Spirit, they couldn't be forgiven.

The reason for this is that you can't be born again without the Holy Spirit (John 3:5-8). He dwells in you (John 14:15-17; Romans 8:9; 1 Corinthians 6:19-20) and works within you to refine your character (Psalm 51:10-11; Galatians 5:22-25; Philippians 2:13). He also reproves you when you sin (John 16:7-13). Therefore, if you refuse to conform to God's will, as the Pharisees were doing, you'll eventually get to the point where you no longer seek forgiveness (1 Timothy 4:1-2).

McSimply 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one is beyond salvation unless they choose to be. Jesus died for the sins of the whole world (John 1:36; 1 John 2:2), and God wants everyone to be saved (1 Timothy 2:4), but He doesn't force anyone to do what's right and good, He lets them choose (Deuteronomy 30:19; Joshua 24:15).

The following are a couple of verses that demonstrate this principle.

"Woe unto them! for they have fled from me: destruction unto them! because they have transgressed against me: though I have redeemed them, yet they have spoken lies against me." Hosea 7:13

"O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!" Matthew 23:37

God also makes it clear that He doesn't take pleasure in the death of the wicked, or anyone for that matter, and that He won't hold someone's sins against them if they choose to turn their life around and follow Him (Ezekiel 18:20-32; Ezekiel 33:11-16).

McSimply 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the story with the colorful circular trophy he gets. I remember seeing a meme of a bunch of these shitheads wearing it as a lapel pin. It's like a colorful circle or some bullshit.

It's for "The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" which is connected to the Great Reset: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf

I'm guessing this is the meme you saw: https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/world-leaders-show-allegiance-to-globalism-great-reset-agenda-2030-sustainable-development/

They're called SDG or "Sustainable Development Goals" lapel pins and are sold by the UN: https://shop.undp.org/products/sdg-lapel-pins

McSimply 2 points ago +2 / -0

By concentrations do you mean how many milligrams to take per pound/kilogram? If so, yes. The table is based on taking 3mg tablets.

McSimply 8 points ago +8 / -0

There are a few different protocols. Here's a link to one:


Scroll down to the last page for a table of recommended dosages based on body weight.

McSimply 3 points ago +3 / -0

A pharmacist in the bay area told my Aunt last week that they could not fill her Ivermectin prescription and they wanted to talk to her doctor about "alternative meds." She pushed back and demanded they fill her prescription as ordered but I'm not sure if they did it.

Good for her, because they were lying and breaking the law.

Source: https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Overcoming-Pharmacy-Barriers.pdf

McSimply 9 points ago +9 / -0

And many of them are wearing white coats or scrubs.

McSimply 5 points ago +5 / -0

I find it interesting how people who want to encourage compliance, as the chaplain in the above article, will readily cite Romans 13 to support their cause while neglecting to mention the context of the same.

"For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil." Romans 13:3-4

Christians are only to obey human government so long as it is in harmony with the Word of God. This principle can be seen in Daniel 3, wherein Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refused to bow to the king of Babylon's golden idol, and also in the latter part of Acts 5, wherein the twelve apostles preached the gospel despite being forbidden to by the local religious authorities.

McSimply 4 points ago +5 / -1

Like all Marxists, the Democrats project their own evildoing onto their opponents.

McSimply 4 points ago +4 / -0

Washington Post

Such a bastion of truth and journalistic integrity. /s

McSimply 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everyone got over it, but her husband died in the Hospital. They made it a point to say he wasn't vaccinated prior to catching COVID.

All of them survived except for the one who went to the hospital. Nothing suspicious about that. /s

McSimply 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's like a movie set. We're literally watching a movie.

McSimply 2 points ago +2 / -0

I imagine at least some of them are the types to try to force the shots onto their employees but not their own children.

McSimply 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't seem to be very fond of any "people of color" that disagree with them either.

McSimply 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus was actually a huge fan of swords.

Inasmuch as a sword, in particular, a two-edged sword is a symbol for the Word of God (Ephesians 6:17; Hebrews 4:12). In turn, Jesus is also called the Word (John 1:1-3; John 1:14; Hebrews 11:3; 1 John 1:1-3; 1 John 5:7).

I bring not peace but a sword

With respect, that is a paraphrase of Matthew 10:34. It's important to note the context.

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me." Matthew 10:34-38

In other words, Jesus was saying that His coming would result in strife among people, even families, with those who've accepted Him being persecuted by those who haven't.

A man who owns a coat but no sword should sell his coat and buy a sword

Also a paraphrase. Here's the context in Luke 22:35-38.

"And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing. Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned among the transgressors: for the things concerning me have an end. And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, It is enough."

This discussion occurred on the same night that Jesus was arrested. Later, when Peter used one of the aforementioned swords to cut off the ear of one of the guards, Jesus admonished Peter and told him to "Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword" (Matthew 26:51-52; John 18:10-11). Evidently, Jesus didn't mean for His disciples to literally go out and purchase swords. When He said "It is enough" as recorded in Luke 22:38, it wasn't an affirmative "That is a sufficient amount of swords," but rather "That's enough of this conversation." Also, there's no mention of the disciples carrying or using swords afterward during the events recorded in Acts or elsewhere.

McSimply 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't know why you were downvoted. You're thinking of Matthew 26:51-52.

"And, behold, one of them which were with Jesus stretched out his hand, and drew his sword, and struck a servant of the high priest's, and smote off his ear. Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."

McSimply 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't care for the opinions of pedophiles or pedophile-enablers and I know this guy's at least one of them.

view more: Next ›