I see what she's doing here. Pretending to be in the know with the good guys but making followers complacent to the evil going on. Sit back, no rush. In fact, go make yourselves more popcorn.
People assume Trump pointing to her is an endorsement. But In the past, both Q and Trump have pointed to people who have turned out NOT to be on our side. I believe this is done to instruct us to do research and to expose them; and/ or to alert 'others on the team' to keep taps on these individuals and what they are up to.
Or Trump could be endorsing her. This is what we are here for, To Do Research, not assume anything.
Those that stirring to action or dissent in GAW are most often exposed as Glowies in the end.
Be at peace fren. This is a research site, not an agitator site. If you don't believe her message, which happens to agree with Q and Trump, and historical postings, then find evidence proving your point.
Flippantly just denying she could be right is canceling. That is not what we do.
The only times he didn't nail it is early on when glowies and DS rinos weren't exposed, so he had to rely on advisors to vouch for the fraudsters. Gotta work out who you can trust first.
Then or when he purposefully got it wrong, to bait or antagonize, but those were obvious.
I see what she's doing here. Pretending to be in the know with the good guys but making followers complacent to the evil going on. Sit back, no rush. In fact, go make yourselves more popcorn.
agreed. I always get nervous about our messengers when they do this. (BUT...trump DID point to her...so there's that)
People assume Trump pointing to her is an endorsement. But In the past, both Q and Trump have pointed to people who have turned out NOT to be on our side. I believe this is done to instruct us to do research and to expose them; and/ or to alert 'others on the team' to keep taps on these individuals and what they are up to.
Or Trump could be endorsing her. This is what we are here for, To Do Research, not assume anything.
Those that stirring to action or dissent in GAW are most often exposed as Glowies in the end.
Be at peace fren. This is a research site, not an agitator site. If you don't believe her message, which happens to agree with Q and Trump, and historical postings, then find evidence proving your point.
Flippantly just denying she could be right is canceling. That is not what we do.
What? Are you ok bro?
He's a human being. Sometimes he nails it, sometimes he doesn't. My theory.
The only times he didn't nail it is early on when glowies and DS rinos weren't exposed, so he had to rely on advisors to vouch for the fraudsters. Gotta work out who you can trust first.
Then or when he purposefully got it wrong, to bait or antagonize, but those were obvious.