I also believe Musk paid $0 for Twitter, refer to EO 13818 "Trump’s Executive Order 13818 Seizes Assets of ANYONE Involved in Human Rights Abuse or Corruption" https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-201700923
Twitter was allegedly involved in private accounts and trafficking. Human rights abuse or corruption assets are allowed to be seized, this would include stocks, businesses, properties, arts, artefacts etc.
To think about, not me telling anyone that is what happened or is happening now but it stands to reason that assets are seized if found guilty, which would suggest that trials for some of the higher ups have already happened.
The shareholders owned twitter until Musk bought it from the shareholders and then took it private. Publicly traded companies will not be part of EO13818. The shares any individual owns will be but not the entire company.
Prince Alwaleed owned 5%, Morgan Stanley 8.4%, Blackrock 6.7%, Vanguard Group 10.78% - So not one individual to seize it from, if they are foreign owned, operated and involved in human rights abuses it could still occur, but must admit I believed it was more cut and dry than that.
Because it's not them doing the selling.
I also believe Musk paid $0 for Twitter, refer to EO 13818 "Trump’s Executive Order 13818 Seizes Assets of ANYONE Involved in Human Rights Abuse or Corruption" https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-201700923
Twitter was allegedly involved in private accounts and trafficking. Human rights abuse or corruption assets are allowed to be seized, this would include stocks, businesses, properties, arts, artefacts etc.
To think about, not me telling anyone that is what happened or is happening now but it stands to reason that assets are seized if found guilty, which would suggest that trials for some of the higher ups have already happened.
The shareholders owned twitter until Musk bought it from the shareholders and then took it private. Publicly traded companies will not be part of EO13818. The shares any individual owns will be but not the entire company.
Prince Alwaleed owned 5%, Morgan Stanley 8.4%, Blackrock 6.7%, Vanguard Group 10.78% - So not one individual to seize it from, if they are foreign owned, operated and involved in human rights abuses it could still occur, but must admit I believed it was more cut and dry than that.
https://qalerts.app/?n=539