Gag orders have been routinely upheld by the Supreme Court. They do not inherently violate someone's First Amendment rights.
But they are considered on a case-by-case basis. If President Trump can make a case on how the gag order violates his First Amendment, then he can ask for a ruling on that.
But Free Speech doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want. I think that many people on this board are under that impression. This is concerning, because of how often we bring up the Constitution here. This is stuff we learned in middle school civics class.
the fact it is a gag order is irrelavent. The justification for it is (no pun intended) trumped up and improperly applied by a bias judge. Focus more on that.
Gag orders have been routinely upheld by the Supreme Court. They do not inherently violate someone's First Amendment rights.
But they are considered on a case-by-case basis. If President Trump can make a case on how the gag order violates his First Amendment, then he can ask for a ruling on that.
But Free Speech doesn't mean you can just say whatever you want. I think that many people on this board are under that impression. This is concerning, because of how often we bring up the Constitution here. This is stuff we learned in middle school civics class.
the fact it is a gag order is irrelavent. The justification for it is (no pun intended) trumped up and improperly applied by a bias judge. Focus more on that.
All you are doing is repeating yourself.