It's a simple yes or no question that you keep avoiding answering.
I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and think that you might not realize that absolute free speech advocates are in favor of things like child pornography.
And the quote you gave is in favor of absolute free speech.
So, by "badgering you", I'm trying to give you a chance to say very clearly that you wouldn't argue in favor of child pornographers.
But if you don't want the chance to clear up any misconceptions there, then fine. I'll choose to take you at your word when you say that you would argue in favor of anyone's use of free speech, including pedophiles.
Also, just a tip, if you don't want to have a conversation with someone, you can always just ignore them. No one can force you to have a conversation online.
Listen up, 5 monther, I have said NO in many ways based in Faith and in response to your questions-what does NO mean to you for prolonging this circuitous diatribe you seem to enjoy. No support for CP, pedophilia or for that matter no support for your spurious "argument".
But you also said that you will defend the rights of people claiming free speech, even if it makes you furious what they do.
Again, you're arguing out of both sides of your mouth.
You can't have it both ways. You either defend absolute free speech, which was what your original comment to me concerning the Voltaire quote was, or you don't.
You could have said you were wrong, and you didn't realize pedophiles used arguments of absolute free speech to defend child pornography.
But it is logically impossible to be for absolute free speech AND be against pedophiles using absolute free speech to defend child pornography.
Again, if you don't want to continue this conversation, then don't. I'm not making you post replies to me.
It's a simple yes or no question that you keep avoiding answering.
I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and think that you might not realize that absolute free speech advocates are in favor of things like child pornography.
And the quote you gave is in favor of absolute free speech.
So, by "badgering you", I'm trying to give you a chance to say very clearly that you wouldn't argue in favor of child pornographers.
But if you don't want the chance to clear up any misconceptions there, then fine. I'll choose to take you at your word when you say that you would argue in favor of anyone's use of free speech, including pedophiles.
Also, just a tip, if you don't want to have a conversation with someone, you can always just ignore them. No one can force you to have a conversation online.
Listen up, 5 monther, I have said NO in many ways based in Faith and in response to your questions-what does NO mean to you for prolonging this circuitous diatribe you seem to enjoy. No support for CP, pedophilia or for that matter no support for your spurious "argument".
But you also said that you will defend the rights of people claiming free speech, even if it makes you furious what they do.
Again, you're arguing out of both sides of your mouth.
You can't have it both ways. You either defend absolute free speech, which was what your original comment to me concerning the Voltaire quote was, or you don't.
You could have said you were wrong, and you didn't realize pedophiles used arguments of absolute free speech to defend child pornography.
But it is logically impossible to be for absolute free speech AND be against pedophiles using absolute free speech to defend child pornography.
Again, if you don't want to continue this conversation, then don't. I'm not making you post replies to me.