Waking up normies is a delicate process. Do it wrong and they'll build a psychological resistance to your arguments. I speak from experience. I was a normie who encountered posts about Hillary and Obama trafficking children and going to Gitmo, and I immediately said "Nope, I'm out." Years later, the stolen election led me back to Q.

We've all discovered by now that we cannot dump data on normies and expect them to process it and shed their lifelong worldview. Unraveling a worldview requires a strategy, of which I've determined there are two types: Customized and generalized. A customized strategy would focus like on a laser on a single issue that the normie is sensitive to, like JFK, 9/11, or the 2020 election. Here's a quick and overly-optimistic dramatization of that: https://tinyurl.com/5yexs38u

For a generalized strategy, no matter how many normies are targeted (as in a forum), the first tactic to keep in mind is that the process of waking up must occur in stages or layers. If you skip a layer or drop some advanced information too soon, your normie target may no longer be receptive.

With this layering approach in mind, here is a rough draft of a strategy for waking up normies to Q:

Layer 1 would involve the recognition that our government is a corrupted uniparty that actively collaborates against us. Q proofs involving FISA abuse are useful for this layer. For me, the foundational proof was the Republicans in Georgia aiding in the steal of the 2020 election. If your audience involves libs, you could refer to congressional Democrats joining with Republicans to vote for the Iraq war, or TARP 1 and 2 to bail out the banks.

Layer 2 would involve the recognition that the uniparty is controlled by elites and banking families through the use of bribes, blackmail, and trafficking of children. Epstein is the foundational proof for this layer. Useful Q posts include the long list of Republicans (4632) and Democrats (4630) who've been busted for pedo stuff. Another useful example is Republican Dennis Hastert and the Democrats who associated with him. There are sadly numerous examples that can be used to make this point.

From here, the normie would be more receptive to Q proofs. In this early stage, it's important to use only the strongest and most simple Q proofs, not complicated decodes with colored lines running to timestamps all over the page. Examples of strong proofs would be "Blunt and Direct Time" (325), or "Chain of command" (521 with the military tweet), or Suicide Weekend with the calendar (700), or the always popular Tippy Top (991). It'd be important to include proofs that play off Trump's tweets to prove Q is coordinating with Trump. For me, the Q proofs about Kushner visiting bin Salman and the ensuing Saudi coup were a nuclear bomb to my worldview.

I would recommend keeping the normie in Layer 2 for a long time to build up trust in Q. This trust will be necessary before moving on to Layer 3 and especially Layer 4.

Layer 3 is where the normie would learn the truth about our intelligence community, secret societies, and Q as a military operation. Some difficult to accept revelations would be North Korea as a CIA black site, or the truth about the Titanic and the Fed Reserve. For me, the proof that gave me chills was "No name returning to headlines" (1706) that synchronized his time of death down to the minute. The proofs about Trump freeing Kim Jong un who then travelled outside NK for the first time in his life were very powerful.

By this time, if the target is still invested in learning, they are no longer a normie, but rather a newbie. Yet still, Layer 4 would be a test of their trust in Q.

Layer 4 would be where the newbie is challenged to make sense of overwhelming information involving ancient esoteric religions and Luciferians ruling the entire world. They'd have to accept that the Nazis were never defeated, but continued their plan in diaspora. They'd learn that the centuries old "Great work" of Freemasonry has always had as its goal a one-world government, that our governments were always controlled, that we never had true representation, and the decline of our culture has been secretly managed. The newbie would have to accept that these people intended to genocide us through a war that America would lose, as outlined in Q's post about the 16 year plan (570). The other side of these revelations would be the corrective action by the military to throw much of our political class in Guantanamo, which is equally overwhelming to process and accept.

So that is my rough draft of the layering of the awakening process. Feel free to stratify your own layers as long as you recognize that information must be classified according to the mindset of your target. However you categorize it, here are some tips:

• Never skip ahead to advanced information. This could backfire and cause your target to reject additional arguments or proofs, so remain disciplined.

• Do not ever try to provide a literal answer to the question "What is Q?" Simply say that Q was basically a White House leaker who became very popular.

• Do not try to correct a normie who says "Q Anon." They do not care about the correction. Let them use the incorrect term until they learn on their own not to.

• Tell the normie to forget everything they've heard about Q, whether by a supporter or a critic. This is because only sensational descriptions of Q have been circulated.

• Tell the normie it's best that you not try to explain Q, but to show it to them.