Emotional Contextualization: If the first half of the article strongly emphasizes the emotional impact of abuse, it sets a highly charged emotional context before introducing facts. This can prime readers to interpret subsequent information more emotionally, which is a common persuasive technique but can introduce bias.
Causality Framing: Framing the abuse as happening partly because of Jim Jordan, without sufficient evidence or without indicating that he was not present during the entire tenure of Strauss, can be misleading. It suggests a level of causality or responsibility that may not be fully supported by the facts. This can indeed be perceived as bias against Jim Jordan, especially if the article does not provide clear evidence of how Jordan was complicit or does not include his responses or defenses.
Selective Chronology: Not clarifying that Jim Jordan’s time at the university did not coincide entirely with Strauss's time there can lead to an incorrect assumption of constant overlap, which can be misleading. A fair article would provide clear timelines to avoid confusion.
I up voted you for the dirt on Jordan, we need to know our own dirt.
I can tell within two sentences via emotional language that I'm being fed manipulative news. I'll continue reading but its hard not to notice.
After reading here's my summary of the bias news of your source:
Any website that endorses Hillary is a propaganda pusher
https://medium.com/@HillaryClinton with beautiful articles such as: https://medium.com/@HillaryClinton/george-floyds-life-mattered-433d8f085d7f https://medium.com/wordsthatmatter/radical-empathy-2b7e273b51a3 https://medium.com/@HillaryClinton/why-joe-biden-should-be-our-next-commander-in-chief-14ec800c4e43
Additionally:
Emotional Contextualization: If the first half of the article strongly emphasizes the emotional impact of abuse, it sets a highly charged emotional context before introducing facts. This can prime readers to interpret subsequent information more emotionally, which is a common persuasive technique but can introduce bias.
Causality Framing: Framing the abuse as happening partly because of Jim Jordan, without sufficient evidence or without indicating that he was not present during the entire tenure of Strauss, can be misleading. It suggests a level of causality or responsibility that may not be fully supported by the facts. This can indeed be perceived as bias against Jim Jordan, especially if the article does not provide clear evidence of how Jordan was complicit or does not include his responses or defenses.
Selective Chronology: Not clarifying that Jim Jordan’s time at the university did not coincide entirely with Strauss's time there can lead to an incorrect assumption of constant overlap, which can be misleading. A fair article would provide clear timelines to avoid confusion.
Nailed it. Pay this man his money.