Flynn was on X22! One of the biggest Q-focused podcasts. We can’t ignore that. He said he has respect for Dave called him a “big boy”. He clearly has listened to a lot of it and still went on it for the interview.
This does not make me think Gen. Flynn is anti-Q.
Anons do not typically believe in one specific thing. Some things are generally accepted but as far as solutions or actions for Anons to take, there isn’t anything set in stone.
Nothing about his comment disproves Q at all. It could simply be another point to prove that even people as Senior as Flynn don’t have to agree on everything. He could be just pushing certain discussion points.
He may even be on here reading the reactions here.
Stay salty frens.
We all know even many normies can see that Anons have been on the side of truth with events unfolding globally now. They just will never admit it. Until it smacks them in the face.
The issue is the disconnect between what Q provided, and how anons continue to interpret it.
Everyone knows that the primary criticism of Q is the implicit complacency among those who "follow" Q --- the WH military is currently in control (via CoG / Law of war / Devolution), and DJT is still President. IOW a complete inversion of all face value circumstances perceived by the American population (left and right).
None of which Q ever indicated. But it maintains as the most powerful narrative, here and elsewhere, and it completely recolors the interpretive lens of current events - these are not real world events with real world consequences, at least nothing that threatens a positive outcome (by 2024? 2028? 2030?) after some moving target precipice is reached.
So how on earth can those of us, springboarding off of Q interpreting the world today through this CoG / Law of War / Devolution, be able to work alongside patriots who absolutely reject all of that as wishful thinking and fantasyland? It's a major wedge in the MAGA movement. By design? Infiltration of Q influencers that have steered the movement towards this unofficial "you're watching a movie" narrative? I don't know, but it needs to get resolved one way or another.
The fact is…Q never said either.
Flynn was on X22! One of the biggest Q-focused podcasts. We can’t ignore that. He said he has respect for Dave called him a “big boy”. He clearly has listened to a lot of it and still went on it for the interview.
This does not make me think Gen. Flynn is anti-Q.
Anons do not typically believe in one specific thing. Some things are generally accepted but as far as solutions or actions for Anons to take, there isn’t anything set in stone.
Nothing about his comment disproves Q at all. It could simply be another point to prove that even people as Senior as Flynn don’t have to agree on everything. He could be just pushing certain discussion points.
He may even be on here reading the reactions here.
Stay salty frens.
We all know even many normies can see that Anons have been on the side of truth with events unfolding globally now. They just will never admit it. Until it smacks them in the face.
The issue is the disconnect between what Q provided, and how anons continue to interpret it.
Everyone knows that the primary criticism of Q is the implicit complacency among those who "follow" Q --- the WH military is currently in control (via CoG / Law of war / Devolution), and DJT is still President. IOW a complete inversion of all face value circumstances perceived by the American population (left and right).
None of which Q ever indicated. But it maintains as the most powerful narrative, here and elsewhere, and it completely recolors the interpretive lens of current events - these are not real world events with real world consequences, at least nothing that threatens a positive outcome (by 2024? 2028? 2030?) after some moving target precipice is reached.
So how on earth can those of us, springboarding off of Q interpreting the world today through this CoG / Law of War / Devolution, be able to work alongside patriots who absolutely reject all of that as wishful thinking and fantasyland? It's a major wedge in the MAGA movement. By design? Infiltration of Q influencers that have steered the movement towards this unofficial "you're watching a movie" narrative? I don't know, but it needs to get resolved one way or another.