There is some critical context to this. First, take note about another Catholic writing on prophecy, rediscovered in the Vatican Archives a couple of centuries ago (spawning Dispensationalism):

The Albury Conferences themselves were sparked by the rediscovery of the writings of the influential Jesuit Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) of Salamanca, who played a major role in the Council of Trent of 1545, which ensured never-ending wars between Catholics and Protestants. This council and its Jesuit controllers are sometimes called ‘the counter-reformation.’

A Jesuit Sleight of Hand Sets the Stage for Zionism Ribera’s primary task was to create an intellectual argument in opposition to the Protestant affirmation that the end times were now (i.e. 1545) and that the Whore of Babylon described in the Book of Revelation was the Catholic Church. Ribera’s solution was simple: make the case why the events of Revelation were neither in the present nor in the past (the majority of Christians at the time believed that the subject of the “Whore of Babylon” was Nero’s Rome). Rather, he argued, they were to take place at some distant moment in the future.

Moreover, in his 500-page treatise In Sacrum Beati Ioannis Apostoli, & Evangelistiae Apocalypsin Commentari, Ribera explained that the signs of the end times would only occur when the temple of Solomon, destroyed in 70 CE during the first Roman Jewish War, was rebuilt (additionally implying the restoration of Jews to their homeland). Ribera’s writings became known as the Futurist School of Pre-Millennial Dispensationalism, from which arose such modern perversions of Christian-Zionism, Rapture theology, and the diverse array of End Times Cultists of Christian and Jewish brands in our modern era.

By the early 17th century, Ribera’s writings had fallen into obscurity. They were only rediscovered when S.R. Maitland (Keeper of Manuscripts for the Archbishop of Canterbury) found himself working in the Vatican archives. Maitland believed the Jesuitical concepts were revolutionary, and they inspired him to write books on the antichrist and End Times in the form of An Inquiry into the Grounds of the Prophetic Period in Daniel and St, John (1826), A Second Inquiry (1829), and An Attempt to Elucidate the Prophecies Concerning Anti Christ (1830).

So like Ribera's screed against the Reformers' indictments agains the Roman pontiff, please consider the near certainty that this so called "Prophecy of the Popes" writing was whipped up in the 16th century, then "rediscovered" and back dated to the 12 century to offer legitimacy (Roman Catholic historians tend to do this trick), and its just another anti-Reforming strategy. Why? To keep the corrupt diseased institution of the Roman Pontiff free of theological and moral critiques (at least in their own minds), and not subject to damning prophetic interpretations by the Reformers who were observing what was going on with their own two eyes. They conveniently offer up their own speculative prophetic interpretations pushing out the end times and tribulations of the Church to some distant future era. Basically, twisting prophetic scriptures to kick the can down the road through an imagined line of faithful popes.

Consider it no more than propaganda IMHO

Technocracy Inc

And Dr Allen Frey demonstrated in the 1960s and 70s that the presence of RF opens the blood brain barrier, which under normal circumstances can keep much of the circulating load of toxic metals out of there. Not anymore, the EMF footprint in our environment is thousands to millions of magnitude higher intensity than just a few decades ago.

It's not just what gets put into the body, its what environment the body gets put into.

DJT is steeped in the same "Power of Positive Thinking" roots as all the name-it-and-claim-it prosperity gospel grifters. Also why he appointed that Paula White lady for the faith advisor role.

Your smartphone already does way more than a REAL ID will ever do.

Not all of us have or ever had smartphones. Though I do realize some of my so called private conversations have been recorded on other people's smart phones.

Which is one of 3 - 4 huge reasons I was highly critical when Hegseth became Sec of Defense. This third-templist, pathological anti-Muslim + pro-Israel fanaticism is part of the bigger Dispensational Apocalyptic Death Cult, practically a mirror image of the geopolitical fundamentalism underlying 20th century jihadists, and these extremist factions are dialectical opposites by (British empire) design. He is religiously and geopolitically psy-opped with this dogma, he is NOT a rational, clear headed candidate for a position as consequential as this. I'd rather him continue to be a drunk than a sop for this crap.

Cloud seeding is real and documented, no one denies it. Mass scale Geoengineering is a distinct concept and that's what's controversial. Whether it is real or not, the problem is it factually is surrounded by die hard believers making dubious claims, poor logic/ lack of evidence or very flimsy evidence, fake whistleblowers, and intel assets like Dane WIgington.

Cloud seeding is not what's controversial. That tech is documented and has been used for decades. Even the most NPC "scientism" debunkers know and acknowlede that.

The controversy is around specific claims regarding Geoengineering (NOT seeding); its tech, prevalence, and what has constituted evidence of such.

A different perspective from a post of a long time lawyer friend, who is very MAGA but disagrees with the admin on this:

"Judge Boasberg, whom I have not met but know by reputation, is not a far-left judge nor one of the crazy lefties. He is a sober judge, well respected and well liked by all who practice before him.

"Judge Boasberg had no choice but to rule as he did given the rules of procedure and existing case law. He issued a TRO to preserve the status quo pending a hearing on the preliminary injunction. That is standard operating procedure in federal courts according to the FRCP. Any judge would have done the same. You hold the status quo until you can study the problem and figure out who is right within 10-15 days. The emergency petition required a snap judgment devoid of any time to study the problem. Judge Boasberg did nothing wrong; what would have been wrong would have been to depart from the law and the FRCP.

"Boasberg merely issued a TRO, good for ten days, until the merits can be reached at a follow up hearing in 10 days. That is SOP for federal courts. I think it likely that the statute does not apply to authorize deportations without hearing, so there may be a problem on the merits.. It's also possible the deportees had due process rights to a hearing before being deported. That, again, is basic law in the U.S. and not something nefarious cooked up by Judge Boasberg. Congress may need to enact clear law authorizing these kinds of deportations."

Not so sure about that. https://rense.com/general86/rebut.htm

Teslas are made out of fossil fuels

After about 3 years, everyone gets replaced at a cellular level. Total turnover is complete by then.

IMHO Ian is an op. He has quickly risen to the top in the Red Pill community, rehashing theories and garnering street cred, going on large platforms to distill these rehashed theories but in a specific framework, among other things framing red pill topics within specific boundaries highly compatible with the current Accelerationist Technocracy takeover that shoehorned its way into the Trump camp.

We'll see how this unfolds in coming months and years. I for one am opting out of any MAGA certified tech restructuring of society.

Rogan is an op as well, until proven otherwise. His format has all the characteristics of a modern Asch experiment.

But what are y'alls thoughts on Musk/DOGE as a handy tool of Technocracy accelerationists?

Must be The Macallan 18!

Of course check out The Conversation from the 70s. Great conspiracy / spy thriller, but low key tone. Coppola wanted to make something more naturalistic and simple in between his Godfather films.

I already have AI fatigue

SF is a celebrity residental locale anyway, prior to Zorro Ranch existing. It has high end, Southwest chic for the jet set.

Most of the child raping wasn't on his island. He had 4 other properties on the main land and one in Paris. Most of the child raping didn't happen there either. They used hotels.

Still the best of them all, hands down.

This was a 19th century vision by Manifest Destiny done the correct, non-genocidal way. It was of course subverted by British imperial maneuvers. Great article about this: https://counterinformation.wordpress.com/2020/06/04/history-the-1887-alaska-purchase-and-the-us-russia-bering-strait-rail-tunnel-project/

Here's more recent history about Alaska/Canada: https://risingtidefoundation.net/2024/10/05/the-strategic-importance-of-the-alaska-canada-railway/

I predict he won't. He's been a true believer. That's why he's in favor of broadening the mRNA tech to the cancer realm.

It is unfortunate, cruel, and the high cost of deferred compliance.

By the same token, there are many non-liberal, particularly elderly, MAGA are also dying off earlier than otherwise after ingesting Trump's Warp Speed messaging, making decisions based on that. If you think just from personal experience that demographic doesn't exist, or is a miniscule amount of "collateral damage", that's more of a cope than understanding the varying kinds of compliant obedience that has been out there.

Hidden puppet master? Soros has been front and center public enemy target for decades ... across the globe. That's his role, to take the heat.

Wrong wrong, my joo-anon. Marx was anti Semitic by proxy in his specific anti capitalist rants in context of that era. Tikhistory's YT channel has plenty of detailed proof of that.

And full fledged Communism? Well that was a Brit psy op to blame on the Jews. Churchill was involved. Richard Poe's new book documents that make-groyper-big-mad history quite thoroughly.