And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us,
when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
Matthew 24:3-4
If this speech was indeed written by Washington, I find the use of "illuminate" in the last sentence very peculiar. Is that a regular word to use in that context?
Why is there no mention of Jesus Christ? He is the Light after all.
Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness,
but shall have the light of life.
John 8:12
Wait a minute, but isn't Satan regarded as the luminous one? Helen Blavatsky, in her "Secret Doctrines" publication that masonry draws from, did describe him as such:
...who sprang from the depths of chaos, was called Lucifer, the "Luminous Son of the Morning"
But this was published almost 100 years later! I guess it's just a choice of words then; Washington had been through a lot after all.
His most significant Masonic activity, however, occurred on September 18, 1793. Acting as grand master pro tem, he presided at the Masonic ceremonial laying of the United States Capitol cornerstone.
So the cornerstone of the United States is "signed" by grand master Washington? Interesting. I wonder what it looks like.
During the time of the American Revolution, we also had:
From the jesuit college at Ingolstadt is said to have issued the sect known as 'the illuminato of bavaria' founded by Adam Weishaupt, ... also being founder of jacobinism...
The jacobines being the main instruments of the french revolution who:
cast off all religious Restraints, and then became fit for perpetrating every Act of Inhumanity. And, it is remarkable, that most of them are actually Scoffers at all religious Principles
Masons and jesuits and illumato and jacobines so many words I wonder if they're all related somehow maybe they sleep in the same bed who knows.
It's all so interesting that these ideas are seemingly popping up one after the other around the same time and each leading to their own revolutions.
Also interesting is the following correspondence between Washington and G.W. Snyder.
Interesting how this back and forth lasted only two months and Washington was essentially "finished" after one month. I guess Washington, being former intelligence, he'd know right? Not worth the time investigating or anything, must already be a solved issue. Not like his intelligence network would have the same foundation of the intelligence networks today or anything. Must all be a coincidence but all interesting nonetheless.
Thanks for sharing this speech! I've never actually read it but that one word really did spark my interest.
You could talk all day about it huh? Let me offer some more to think about! I'd think you'd appreciate the perspective and thought.
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit,
seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
1 Timothy 3:16
Jesus Christ is God my fren. That's why I mention the lack of Washington's mention of Christ, which happens to be in contrast with Q#4379 that popped up when you searched "Jesus": it has mention of Lord, armor of God (his Word), Supreme Commander, Almighty One (as you mentioned), all culminating with Jesus.
So why did He appear as the Son, and not the Father, you might ask?
But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.
Isaiah 59:2
It really is all fascinating stuff and there's a looooooot of digging as you said.
I wonder what the spiritual or humanist or ecumenical or other similar movements might try to achieve by trying to demote Jesus Christ as "less-than". Are those movements part of the spiritual evil that Q mentions when quoting Ephesians? Take a peek at Q#197 too (sorry I don't yet know how to embed Q posts directly - https://qposts.online/post/197).
Also, since you mentioned Buddha and Krishna, have you read anything similar to:
Masonic & Occult Symbols Illustrated by Cathy Burns
I'm sure you know of their signs and symbol, and you can probably trace all of the symbolism back to pantheism and ancient pagan sun/moon worship. For Buddha in particular it's the hand signs representing the holy trinity (of what though?), for Hinduism most know of the red dot, or teeka, which looks like the sun doesn't it? All interesting stuff.
And he brought me into the inner court of the Lord's house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the Lord, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the Lord, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east.
Ezekiel 8:16
They had their backs toward God and their eyes facing the sun.
Just as Q said, the depths of the division by religion goes veeerrrrryyyy deep.
George Washington was a class act. He could've been a Simon Bolivar, a William Walker, or any of a handful of names of conquerors and strongmen, but he chose to stand for freedom and give it away.
His farewell address is solid, too. But this is what we need now. Thanks, Mr. first president, George Washington.
As inspiring as this sounds, I have been unable to find this passage in the writings of George Washington. I have found his farewell address, but this "epistle" (as it's described) I cannot locate in the works of Washington.
Can anyone direct me to the specific writing, if this is indeed by Geo. Washington?
"Begin by retaking your local assemblies and councils. The seed of Liberty germinates in the fertile soil of local governance. The Articles of Confederation, as imperfect as they were, harbored a deep mistrust of centralized power for this very reason. Influence and power must be so divided and balanced among general and particular Governments, as that neither can transcend their legal limits, without being effectually checked and restrained by the others. In simpler terms, wrest power back into the hands of your local governments, and the potential for overarching federal infringement will naturally wane."
This sounds exactly like what Gen. Flynn was saying...Stop waiting for the calvary!
If this speech was indeed written by Washington, I find the use of "illuminate" in the last sentence very peculiar. Is that a regular word to use in that context?
Why is there no mention of Jesus Christ? He is the Light after all.
Wait a minute, but isn't Satan regarded as the luminous one? Helen Blavatsky, in her "Secret Doctrines" publication that masonry draws from, did describe him as such:
But this was published almost 100 years later! I guess it's just a choice of words then; Washington had been through a lot after all.
So the cornerstone of the United States is "signed" by grand master Washington? Interesting. I wonder what it looks like.
During the time of the American Revolution, we also had:
The jacobines being the main instruments of the french revolution who:
Masons and jesuits and illumato and jacobines so many words I wonder if they're all related somehow maybe they sleep in the same bed who knows. It's all so interesting that these ideas are seemingly popping up one after the other around the same time and each leading to their own revolutions.
Also interesting is the following correspondence between Washington and G.W. Snyder.
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/06-02-02-0435
Interesting how this back and forth lasted only two months and Washington was essentially "finished" after one month. I guess Washington, being former intelligence, he'd know right? Not worth the time investigating or anything, must already be a solved issue. Not like his intelligence network would have the same foundation of the intelligence networks today or anything. Must all be a coincidence but all interesting nonetheless.
Thanks for sharing this speech! I've never actually read it but that one word really did spark my interest.
You could talk all day about it huh? Let me offer some more to think about! I'd think you'd appreciate the perspective and thought.
Jesus Christ is God my fren. That's why I mention the lack of Washington's mention of Christ, which happens to be in contrast with Q#4379 that popped up when you searched "Jesus": it has mention of Lord, armor of God (his Word), Supreme Commander, Almighty One (as you mentioned), all culminating with Jesus.
So why did He appear as the Son, and not the Father, you might ask?
It really is all fascinating stuff and there's a looooooot of digging as you said.
I wonder what the spiritual or humanist or ecumenical or other similar movements might try to achieve by trying to demote Jesus Christ as "less-than". Are those movements part of the spiritual evil that Q mentions when quoting Ephesians? Take a peek at Q#197 too (sorry I don't yet know how to embed Q posts directly - https://qposts.online/post/197).
Also, since you mentioned Buddha and Krishna, have you read anything similar to:
Masonic & Occult Symbols Illustrated by Cathy Burns
I'm sure you know of their signs and symbol, and you can probably trace all of the symbolism back to pantheism and ancient pagan sun/moon worship. For Buddha in particular it's the hand signs representing the holy trinity (of what though?), for Hinduism most know of the red dot, or teeka, which looks like the sun doesn't it? All interesting stuff.
They had their backs toward God and their eyes facing the sun.
Just as Q said, the depths of the division by religion goes veeerrrrryyyy deep.
George Washington was a class act. He could've been a Simon Bolivar, a William Walker, or any of a handful of names of conquerors and strongmen, but he chose to stand for freedom and give it away.
His farewell address is solid, too. But this is what we need now. Thanks, Mr. first president, George Washington.
As inspiring as this sounds, I have been unable to find this passage in the writings of George Washington. I have found his farewell address, but this "epistle" (as it's described) I cannot locate in the works of Washington.
Can anyone direct me to the specific writing, if this is indeed by Geo. Washington?
"Begin by retaking your local assemblies and councils. The seed of Liberty germinates in the fertile soil of local governance. The Articles of Confederation, as imperfect as they were, harbored a deep mistrust of centralized power for this very reason. Influence and power must be so divided and balanced among general and particular Governments, as that neither can transcend their legal limits, without being effectually checked and restrained by the others. In simpler terms, wrest power back into the hands of your local governments, and the potential for overarching federal infringement will naturally wane."
This sounds exactly like what Gen. Flynn was saying...Stop waiting for the calvary!