Yeah, they're all lying, and no one in Trump's administration ever said a word calling them out as liars. Ever. Over 4 years in office. And the people in Trump's administration that were called out by name saying Trump was doing that just kept quiet when they were being lied about in national publications. I (This is all sarcasm, if you can't tell)
Why is it that whenever any of those sources print something that anyone here thinks is good, they suddenly turn very reliable? I'm curious, what publications WOULD you believe? What if some random person writing under an alias on some little known news blog wrote it? Would you believe it then?
What exactly do you think the word "shill" means? Because the way it's used here, it seems to just mean "someone who says something I don't like".
And it's hysterical that four different publications saying the same thing isn't evidence enough of something, but I've seen dozens of people here believe the most ridiculous shit just because someone posted a screenshot of some random person on Twitter saying they heard some other random person say some ridiculous thing happened.
But whatever, go ahead and argue to others that Pelosi should go to prison for tearing up papers and then act surprised when Trump's actions are used as a counterpoint to that. I really don't care if you look stupid in front of others.
Uh-huh. Because it's just too hard to evaluate things on a case-by-case basis, so just dismiss everything without even half a thought.
Unless of course, it's an article that you find useful, then you post it and make a huge deal about how this big paper is printing it. I see that happen here frequently.
It's crazy how an "elite research board" has so many people who can't be bothered to look at like 99% of publications in the country, because they're biased.
Just writing off everything from a source as fake is just as ignorant as believing everything from a source is 100% accurate.
But go ahead, you just keep ignoring everything that doesn't agree with you. I'm sure that will work out well for you. Just be clueless about what the other side is doing/saying. But please don't try to talk to anyone that holds an opposing opinion, because you'll just come out of those conversations looking completely ignorant about what's going on.
Here are some examples of when MSM articles are most welcome here:
That's just from doing a search here on "Washington Post" and taking two minutes to go through some of the posts. If I wanted to, I could find hundreds of examples of people posting links to "propaganda" without anyone saying boo to them.
Why aren't you running around jumping up their asses about linking MSM here?
Yeah, they're all lying, and no one in Trump's administration ever said a word calling them out as liars. Ever. Over 4 years in office. And the people in Trump's administration that were called out by name saying Trump was doing that just kept quiet when they were being lied about in national publications. I (This is all sarcasm, if you can't tell)
Why is it that whenever any of those sources print something that anyone here thinks is good, they suddenly turn very reliable? I'm curious, what publications WOULD you believe? What if some random person writing under an alias on some little known news blog wrote it? Would you believe it then?
What exactly do you think the word "shill" means? Because the way it's used here, it seems to just mean "someone who says something I don't like".
And it's hysterical that four different publications saying the same thing isn't evidence enough of something, but I've seen dozens of people here believe the most ridiculous shit just because someone posted a screenshot of some random person on Twitter saying they heard some other random person say some ridiculous thing happened.
But whatever, go ahead and argue to others that Pelosi should go to prison for tearing up papers and then act surprised when Trump's actions are used as a counterpoint to that. I really don't care if you look stupid in front of others.
if you think that linking to propaganda news is gonna get you anything but hard flak from people here, you're in the wrong place
Uh-huh. Because it's just too hard to evaluate things on a case-by-case basis, so just dismiss everything without even half a thought.
Unless of course, it's an article that you find useful, then you post it and make a huge deal about how this big paper is printing it. I see that happen here frequently.
It's crazy how an "elite research board" has so many people who can't be bothered to look at like 99% of publications in the country, because they're biased.
Just writing off everything from a source as fake is just as ignorant as believing everything from a source is 100% accurate.
But go ahead, you just keep ignoring everything that doesn't agree with you. I'm sure that will work out well for you. Just be clueless about what the other side is doing/saying. But please don't try to talk to anyone that holds an opposing opinion, because you'll just come out of those conversations looking completely ignorant about what's going on.
Here are some examples of when MSM articles are most welcome here:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rSsef09G/a-surprising-number-of-celebriti/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9RmYLpw/cnn-has-finally-decided-to-start/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPnvBXK2/ignorance-kills-accornig-to-a-20/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTVNPyc4/ukrainian-official-says-kyiv-d/c/
That's just from doing a search here on "Washington Post" and taking two minutes to go through some of the posts. If I wanted to, I could find hundreds of examples of people posting links to "propaganda" without anyone saying boo to them.
Why aren't you running around jumping up their asses about linking MSM here?
try harder
No, I'm done beating my head against a wall talking to you.
Have a great day.