Thx fren! I hope folks are making it to the bottom right where the real payout is, and all of a sudden #3826 explodes with meaning.
Q team tying this all the way back to Trump's last SOTU is badass.
Also we should be considering @PapiTrumpo as equivalent to @realdonaldtrump. I'm not sure how anyone could argue otherwise but I'd be excited if someone tried!
Now the fun with this is Benny Johnson here notes that Johnson had called out the fact that Pelosi had committed a felony by destroying the copy of the SOTU she had been given!
This interview also has some additional relevant context. Pelosi's defenders argue this copy of the speech was a "personal copy" and not an "official record"!
Highly relevant to the Trump document cases! I suspect we'll see this theme emerge in casework soon. The white hats love to place the cabal into these catch-22 scenarios where they have to "pick an argument". Is a copy a personal record or an official record? Was this a copy or the only official record? What if there was no secondary copy?
a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
Despite Pelosi having ripped the speech up, it does appear in the record, starting on page 5. ;)
This is so good ,, thank you !
Thx fren! I hope folks are making it to the bottom right where the real payout is, and all of a sudden #3826 explodes with meaning.
Q team tying this all the way back to Trump's last SOTU is badass.
Also we should be considering @PapiTrumpo as equivalent to @realdonaldtrump. I'm not sure how anyone could argue otherwise but I'd be excited if someone tried!
Yes , going through the whole thing is exciting !
@PapiTrumpo twice calls the shot for @RepMikeJohnson as speaker of the house.
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1717000841322746261
https://twitter.com/PapiTrumpo/status/1717038687932809258
Mike Johnson doesn't appear to call his shot till some sharp anon's realize that MJ's 6666th post links to drop #3826:
https://greatawakening.win/p/17rSxKATiB/soth-elected--in-god-we-trust/
A look at the contents of drop #3826 to this Scavino tweet reference State of the Union (SOTU 2020):
https://twitter.com/Scavino45/status/1224922494412427265
Now the fun with this is Benny Johnson here notes that Johnson had called out the fact that Pelosi had committed a felony by destroying the copy of the SOTU she had been given!
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1717264462363742218
Voila! "Sometimes the past can find the future."
u/LBTrumplican2 u/Juice u/eagle-eyes2020 u/queue-anon u/ValueFuckingDeep
====
This interview also has some additional relevant context. Pelosi's defenders argue this copy of the speech was a "personal copy" and not an "official record"!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk7ON0RJzy8
Highly relevant to the Trump document cases! I suspect we'll see this theme emerge in casework soon. The white hats love to place the cabal into these catch-22 scenarios where they have to "pick an argument". Is a copy a personal record or an official record? Was this a copy or the only official record? What if there was no secondary copy?
Ugh so many apologies for getting the quote backwards in the title. 🤣🤣
I’ve done that too. Excellent post
Here is the code Johnson cited:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
Despite Pelosi having ripped the speech up, it does appear in the record, starting on page 5. ;)
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2020-02-04/pdf/CREC-2020-02-04.pdf