President Trump Qincidentally pointing to last night as a False Flag
(media.greatawakening.win)
Q-analysis!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
I don't see this as a comm because Q never told us to reference a drop based on the duration of a video. I do think it's deliberate when a video is 17 seconds long but other times, the duration is arbitrary.
The major false flag referenced by this drop was the Sutherland Springs church shooting which happened on November 5th, 2017.
Here's a good one from the military that uses duration, date, and content of the tweet.
🔥🔥🔥🔥
2-17 is merely the 2nd battalion, 17th field artillery. Yes, some numbers happen to match but what info Q is conveying to us through this? That the Army is attacking the CIA? I don't get it. Also, Q almost exclusively communicates through Trump's account and sometimes Dan Scavino but not the US Army account.
Here's a solid Q proof from the US Army account.
Some proofs don't convey useful info to us, they're just really cool and keep us motivated and help build up the mountain of Q proofs for normies. But it could've been a message from Q to the deepstate about the CIA or things going on behind the scenes.
"2-17 is merely the 2nd battalion" That's how Q has to operate with plausible deniability, so normies can still deny it, so it forces them to research deeper to find out Q is real instead of Trump just blatantly telling everyone it's real.
There's a lot of good proofs that come from other military accounts and a few from Pompeo.
Some military ones with a Q in them 1, --2, --3.
And a Military documentary that had a 17 second clip with a Q on the coffee mug, and Q had used the name of that documentary in a Q post a few days before it came out. But the name of the soldier holding the Q coffee mug is Quincy. Plausible deniability as strong as the coffee, would've been funny if his name was Quincy Dent (coincident). Jump to 59:55 in this vid
Pompeo did the super epic Red 6 countdown. Red6 ---Red5 ---Red4 ---Red3 ---Red2 ---Red1. And then Another countdown a few days later.
In the North Korea summit video, Q highlights that the 1:07 timestamp of the video was intentional.
17 = 1:07 timestamp when the video said "Out of the darkness comes the light". Q had said Dark to Light a week earlier.
I remember this one. To me, it was just Q proving to us that they are working with the Trump admin. Q deliberately inserted an easter egg at the timestamp and told the anons to look for it. This was one of the many undeniable Q proofs.
But that's very different from an anon taking the length of a recent Trump video, matching it to a Q drop number, and claiming that's Trump talking to us. After this video, Trump posted another video of him golfing which was 23 seconds long. By your logic, is Trump also trying to communicate to us via Q drop #23?
I know what you mean, but do you see the similarity of what Trump said compared to part of drop 47, of course there's far stronger proofs, i'd never show this one to normies. It's a double correlation. Trump said something similar to the Q drop AND the Q drop warned of a false flag AND the number 47 was used to link them, then a mass shooting happens a day after Trump posts it. If he posts a 23 second golf video, and Q drop 23 has nothing to do with golf, then i'd agree it would be meaningless.
Trump post: What a difference a President makes
Q post: How has POTUS made such progress in the short time he's been President
Imagine if Trump said "Power to the people" with a 23 second golf video, then Q drop 23 also said "Return power back to the people" or something like that.
Trump will point to Q posts that focus on a general subject (FF, shooter, etc).
It's not always in the context of the past Q drop like you mentioned Sutherland.
They are using old drops to communicate. It's been done so many times it's no longer a "coincidence".
Future proves past.