17
FlyingScotzman 17 points ago +17 / -0

Tell me Q is real without telling me Q is real.

1
FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +1 / -0

could it have been someone with learning disabilities, where that happens if the parent or guardian wants them vaxxed.

2
FlyingScotzman 2 points ago +2 / -0

What do you think the consent form is giving them permission to do? Physically restrain a mentally competent adult and vax them against their will?

1
FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean they're not going to give you a vaccine while you're unconscious for an operation. I guess it just means you're agreeing they have the right to drop you if you refuse a vax maybe.

2
FlyingScotzman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think too much sickening corruption and child trafficking being revealed especially the government's involvement in kidnapping immigrants, and the sheer scale of government tax payer fraud would cause civil war and uprisings to abolish all governments, and would not be a good thing, and result in society collapsing and going back to the middle ages.

The idea of governance itself is good, The problem is how easy it can get infiltrated, so I believe the Q movie is about showing just enough of the corruption so it trains the population of how to spot the infiltration and brainwashing tactics of the media, but not showing too much so people lose all faith in institutions and civilization as we know it completely collapses.

For example with pizzagate, i believe the usual suspects named like Alefantis and Podesta etc, Hillary and a few dozen other high profile politicians, along with probably less than 100 high profile CEOs and Hollywood actors, will all be exposed and have their blackmail videos published. I don't think the public can handle anymore than that, the fact that there's so many more guilty, such as the Pope, and the Queen, and literally probably 20%+ of every single government in the world, and 1,000s more celebrities and high profile people. Let alone the hundreds of thousands invovled that would have to do the dirty work and run the trafficking networks and DUMBs.

 

We haven’t started the drops re: human trafficking/ sacrifices [yet][worst].

Those [good] who know cannot sleep.

Those [good] who know cannot find peace.

Those [good] who know will not rest until those responsible are held accountable.

Nobody can possibly imagine the pure evil and corruption out there.

Those you trust are the most guilty of sin.

Who are we taught to trust?

If you are religious, PRAY.

60% must remain private [at least] - for humanity.

These people should be hanging.

Q

2
FlyingScotzman 2 points ago +2 / -0

God bless the cops who destroyed the evidence, so he wouldn't have to go to jail for killing a pedo fuck.

3
FlyingScotzman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Eric gave one of the best Normie explanations i've heard as to how Epstein was able to appeal to high profile people and offer them privacy.

From this timestamp 1:36:17

https://youtu.be/4OKNS5j0lSY?t=5777

1
FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Posted at 11:18 am

u/#q1234

u/#q3579

Wow, just noticed the pattern with 1234 and 3579 and those seem to be the only 2 posts with 11.11.18

1
FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you believe the Charlie Kirk snake eye coincidences were on purpose or just a coincidence? And if so, do you believe it was the White or black hats that made the movie? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8CZJlGFkr3k

1
FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do they not realize we need more ICE to cool the temperature.

2
FlyingScotzman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ironically there is a Q post with an upside down gun lol. #1464

4
FlyingScotzman 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not trying to defend Spielberg, he may indeed be a black hat, but no one can deny he's been involved in several great hits. Jaws, ET, Saving Private Ryan, Minority Report, Jurassic Park, Indiana Jones, and a couple more. Although he mostly directs and doesn't write as much other other people. Like Christopher Nolan is my favorite. Which directors do you think are the top 3 for their overall work?

3
FlyingScotzman 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't see it either. Is "Can't stop, won't stop" some kind of reference?

Edit: From what I gather, it seems to be a meme regarding Game Stop https://theboar.org/2021/02/cant-stop-wont-stop-gamestop-how-everyday-investors-squeezed-wall-streets-finest/

And MOASS means Mother of all Short Squeezes

2
FlyingScotzman 2 points ago +2 / -0

As long as the Chip doesn't go in the right hand or forehead, it's all good. /s

1
FlyingScotzman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone could just print it and put it on the outside of the glass as a prank. There's no visible tape or blu tac, making it looked like it's attached to the outside, rather than the inside as they usually would, otherwise rain would ruin all their posters.

If it were real, then it would be rolled out to 1,000s of Subways and there'd be 100s of videos of it.

2
FlyingScotzman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed, after 1,000s of games you're bound to get lucky where 2 different batters hit it consecutively with a very similar direction and speed, resulting in the fielders running back to the same place to catch it, considering it's normal for them to also hangout in the same spot on the field most of the time.

view more: Next ›