My points stands regardless of an article. You do not need cursive for a signature, normal long hand isn't easier to imitate than cursive if that's what people are worried about.
I cannot think of any reason we need to write it.
There are 1,000 more important things we should be making children learn.
When you fill out papers and it says to print your name on one line and then asks for a signature on a second line...what is the distinction if there is no difference between the two?
LOL the guy is getting his argument from Psychology Today and that field (and publication) has been garbage for decades...my main point in chiming in here though is that username
My points stands regardless of an article. You do not need cursive for a signature, normal long hand isn't easier to imitate than cursive if that's what people are worried about.
I cannot think of any reason we need to write it.
There are 1,000 more important things we should be making children learn.
When you fill out papers and it says to print your name on one line and then asks for a signature on a second line...what is the distinction if there is no difference between the two?
There doesn't have to be...do you not know how signatures work or something?
LOL the guy is getting his argument from Psychology Today and that field (and publication) has been garbage for decades...my main point in chiming in here though is that username