There are a number of grammatical errors. At the end it mentions that this was manually transcribed from images of a parchment document. It's plausible that the errors all come from transcription.
It's unfortunate because the document provides valuable historical information. But it's got a hundred or more serious grammatical and typographical errors, reducing it to a tin foil hat level of conspiracy. Intentional?
It's a great document, but if they want people to take it seriously they need to fix the numerous typos.
There are a number of grammatical errors. At the end it mentions that this was manually transcribed from images of a parchment document. It's plausible that the errors all come from transcription.
It's unfortunate because the document provides valuable historical information. But it's got a hundred or more serious grammatical and typographical errors, reducing it to a tin foil hat level of conspiracy. Intentional?