There has never been a genuine isolation of any virus ever. The whole thing is pathetic. I NEVER would have believed this until I watched COVID debacle play out and then researched. Science is full of liars, and it has been that way!! We've all been conned.
Excerpt:
There are something like ten thousand published papers that refer to the âisolationâ of such-and-such a virus. Virologists will show you the title of these papers and say, âSee, how can you say this isnât true?â But since they arenât using the proper steps, you have to know what they did instead. And you have to ask, did they rigorously validate every step of their process?
In 1954, a researcher named John Franklin Enders established the procedures that rejuvenated the then-languishing field of virology.3 Here are Endersâ basic steps:
Virologists take snot from somebody alleged to have a certain disease (such as measles or Covid-19).
Sometimes they centrifuge (not ultracentrifuge) or filter the mixture to get rid of cells, fungi and debris. That has become a sticking point because some people call this âpurification.â However, purifying the snot a little is not equivalent to purifying out a virus.
Next, they put the snot in a cell culture of green monkey kidney cellsâcells that happen to be highly inbred and tend to break down easily.
Then they mix in antibioticsâand specifically antibiotics that are kidney-toxic (gentamicin and amphotericin)âand they take away the cell culture mediumâs nutrients. (This is the equivalent of being forced onto a standard American diet after thriving on a Wise Traditions diet.)
Next, they mix in fetal bovine serum, a product sucked out of the heart of a newborn calf.
Maintaining the cell culture at a steady temperature, they then watch what happens. In about five days, the cells break downâ which is called a cytopathic effect (CPE)âand they call the CPE the âproofâ that the virus exists and causes damage.
Understand that virologists consider this processâwhich inevitably generates cell breakdownânot âaâ proof but âtheâ proof for the existence of all pathogenic viruses. You might reasonably ask, âHow do you know the CPE is not due to starving the cells, or poisoning them with gentamiÂcin and amphotericin, or using fetal bovine serum, or because of some other toxin in the sick personâs snot?â Virologistsâ answer is that they do a âmock infectionâ as a control. However, if you go to the hundreds of papers I and my colleagues have read over the past two years, you will not find even one actual mock infection. In fact, it canât be done because the independent variable would necessarily need to be the very virus that they have not isolated. Often, the study authors donât even provide details, and if you try to obtain more information, you invariably learn that they did not conduct a properly controlled experiment.
Interestingly, Endersâ procedures are also how pharmaceutical companies make viral vaccines.4 For example, they take someone with measles and put their unpurified snot into a monkey kidney cell culture, add fetal bovine serum, gentamicin, and amphotericin, and then when the cells break down, they call that âisolationâ of the measles virus. They put that goop into a vialâand that is called a âliveâ virus vaccine. They can also cycle the goop over and over in huge vats, removing some of the proteins, and that is an âattenuatedâ viral vaccine. But at no point did they ever demonstrate there is a virus in there. With mRNA and newer technologies, they are just putting different stuffâknown and unknownâin their vaccines. In short, vaccines are biotoxins, and they make people sick. How could biotoxins possibly prevent people from getting sick?
There has never been a genuine isolation of any virus ever. The whole thing is pathetic. I NEVER would have believed this until I watched COVID debacle play out and then researched. Science is full of liars, and it has been that way!! We've all been conned.
Excerpt:
There are something like ten thousand published papers that refer to the âisolationâ of such-and-such a virus. Virologists will show you the title of these papers and say, âSee, how can you say this isnât true?â But since they arenât using the proper steps, you have to know what they did instead. And you have to ask, did they rigorously validate every step of their process?
In 1954, a researcher named John Franklin Enders established the procedures that rejuvenated the then-languishing field of virology.3 Here are Endersâ basic steps:
Virologists take snot from somebody alleged to have a certain disease (such as measles or Covid-19).
Sometimes they centrifuge (not ultracentrifuge) or filter the mixture to get rid of cells, fungi and debris. That has become a sticking point because some people call this âpurification.â However, purifying the snot a little is not equivalent to purifying out a virus.
Next, they put the snot in a cell culture of green monkey kidney cellsâcells that happen to be highly inbred and tend to break down easily.
Then they mix in antibioticsâand specifically antibiotics that are kidney-toxic (gentamicin and amphotericin)âand they take away the cell culture mediumâs nutrients. (This is the equivalent of being forced onto a standard American diet after thriving on a Wise Traditions diet.)
Next, they mix in fetal bovine serum, a product sucked out of the heart of a newborn calf.
Maintaining the cell culture at a steady temperature, they then watch what happens. In about five days, the cells break downâ which is called a cytopathic effect (CPE)âand they call the CPE the âproofâ that the virus exists and causes damage.
Understand that virologists consider this processâwhich inevitably generates cell breakdownânot âaâ proof but âtheâ proof for the existence of all pathogenic viruses. You might reasonably ask, âHow do you know the CPE is not due to starving the cells, or poisoning them with gentamiÂcin and amphotericin, or using fetal bovine serum, or because of some other toxin in the sick personâs snot?â Virologistsâ answer is that they do a âmock infectionâ as a control. However, if you go to the hundreds of papers I and my colleagues have read over the past two years, you will not find even one actual mock infection. In fact, it canât be done because the independent variable would necessarily need to be the very virus that they have not isolated. Often, the study authors donât even provide details, and if you try to obtain more information, you invariably learn that they did not conduct a properly controlled experiment.
Interestingly, Endersâ procedures are also how pharmaceutical companies make viral vaccines.4 For example, they take someone with measles and put their unpurified snot into a monkey kidney cell culture, add fetal bovine serum, gentamicin, and amphotericin, and then when the cells break down, they call that âisolationâ of the measles virus. They put that goop into a vialâand that is called a âliveâ virus vaccine. They can also cycle the goop over and over in huge vats, removing some of the proteins, and that is an âattenuatedâ viral vaccine. But at no point did they ever demonstrate there is a virus in there. With mRNA and newer technologies, they are just putting different stuffâknown and unknownâin their vaccines. In short, vaccines are biotoxins, and they make people sick. How could biotoxins possibly prevent people from getting sick?
Read more here: https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/what-makes-us-sick/#gsc.tab=0