This question is about using a dataset to claim ANY position to the uneducated.
It is not even about Geography as the "data" could just as easily come from education levels OR occupations OR managerial status in a fortune 500 company. There is nothing uniquely geographical about the data.
Additionally, by using the data in this way, it implies that one can not only claim any wild conclusion they want, but also that corollation "proves" causation.
The course should be called Manipulation AP not Geography AP.
This question is about using a dataset to claim ANY position to the uneducated.
It is not even about Geography as the "data" could just as easily come from education levels OR occupations OR managerial status in a fortune 500 company. There is nothing uniquely geographical about the data.
Additionally, by using the data in this way, it implies that one can not only claim any wild conclusion they want, but also that corollation "proves" causation.
The course should be called Manipulation AP not Geography AP.