This 3 State "We've Got Him Now" Lawfare Circus is About to Go Right Down the Toilet... - The Great Awakening

This 3 State "We've Got Him Now" Lawfare Circus is About to Go Right Down the Toilet... (www.dailysignal.com) 🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸

posted 1 year ago by PitBoss711 1 year ago by PitBoss711 +231 / -0

Bid to Keep Trump Off '24 Ballot Is Naked Lawfare, Unconstitutional

These anti-Trump ballot challenges are lawfare at its worst, trying to use the law and the courts as a political weapon.

16 comments

16 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (16)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– TSearch 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

I wasn’t aware there is an argument that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was actually nullified in two Congressional votes.

Congress voted to remove the disqualification twice. The Amnesty Act of 1872 stated that the “political disabilities” imposed by Section 3 “are hereby removed from all persons whomsoever” except for members of the 36th and 37th Congresses and certain other military and foreign officials. Note that there is no time limit in this language.

Congress even got rid of these remaining exceptions in the Amnesty Act of 1898, which stated that “the disability imposed by section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States heretofore incurred is hereby removed.” There was no language preserving any of the disqualifications for future cases.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– MackTUTT 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That's interesting. But even though in practical terms the constitution is being modified like this constantly isn't an amendment technically required to change it?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– TSearch 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The argument is the amendment provides the method for removing this stipulation.

But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

The author is saying there are valid arguments that these two Congressional votes, which made the two-thirds threshold were worded in such a way they removed the stipulation for past and future cases.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– MackTUTT 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Oh okay, thanks for clearing that up.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q