Statute of limitations is pretty clear cut. It either happened in the scope period or it didn’t. Improperly admitting evidence is a good way to get cases overturned on appeal
Statute of limitations is pretty clear cut. It either happened in the scope period or it didn’t.
This was already decided before the trial.
Trump and the AG reached an agreement on this back in 2021 that said the liability can only be from 2014 at the earliest.
Ivanka Trump was originally a defendant in this case, but the appeals court cut her loose due to the Statue of limitations.
Some of the defendants were not part of this agreement and they can only be liable from 2016 on.
But some of the loans originally originated in 2011 and 2012. There's no liability for those years, but they are evidence for later years. The loans themselves went like 10 years, past 2014.
OBJECTION!
Commie judge is overruling the law
https://media.patriots.win/post/A8bwHfvcfDCC.png
Statute of limitations is pretty clear cut. It either happened in the scope period or it didn’t. Improperly admitting evidence is a good way to get cases overturned on appeal
This was already decided before the trial.
Trump and the AG reached an agreement on this back in 2021 that said the liability can only be from 2014 at the earliest. Ivanka Trump was originally a defendant in this case, but the appeals court cut her loose due to the Statue of limitations.
Some of the defendants were not part of this agreement and they can only be liable from 2016 on.
But some of the loans originally originated in 2011 and 2012. There's no liability for those years, but they are evidence for later years. The loans themselves went like 10 years, past 2014.