Statute of limitations is pretty clear cut. It either happened in the scope period or it didn’t. Improperly admitting evidence is a good way to get cases overturned on appeal
Statute of limitations is pretty clear cut. It either happened in the scope period or it didn’t.
This was already decided before the trial.
Trump and the AG reached an agreement on this back in 2021 that said the liability can only be from 2014 at the earliest.
Ivanka Trump was originally a defendant in this case, but the appeals court cut her loose due to the Statue of limitations.
Some of the defendants were not part of this agreement and they can only be liable from 2016 on.
But some of the loans originally originated in 2011 and 2012. There's no liability for those years, but they are evidence for later years. The loans themselves went like 10 years, past 2014.
AND that is ABSOLUTELY correct...IF AND ONLY IF this case makes it to the NEXT LEVEL...this judge will more than likely be censored...Couldn't happend to a nicer Alpha Hotel (Ass Hotel)...f😁😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is the state-wide trial court with the broadest jurisdiction, both in criminal and civil matters. It can hear virtually any type of case brought before it, with the exception of claims brought against the state which must be heard by the Court of Claims. However, it generally hears only cases that are outside the jurisdiction of other trial courts of more limited jurisdiction.
Next would be the New York pellet division followed by the New York Court of Appeals That's the highest court in New York state.
The NYC Property Appraiser HAD to be INVOLVED and write-off on the estimates of the building(s)
I don't think this is true. I don't think anything regarding taxes is part of this case. Seems like only bank loans and insurance claims are.
They talked about a low appraisal of Mar-A-Lago in Florida. That have been for tax purposes
OBJECTION!
Commie judge is overruling the law
https://media.patriots.win/post/A8bwHfvcfDCC.png
Statute of limitations is pretty clear cut. It either happened in the scope period or it didn’t. Improperly admitting evidence is a good way to get cases overturned on appeal
This was already decided before the trial.
Trump and the AG reached an agreement on this back in 2021 that said the liability can only be from 2014 at the earliest. Ivanka Trump was originally a defendant in this case, but the appeals court cut her loose due to the Statue of limitations.
Some of the defendants were not part of this agreement and they can only be liable from 2016 on.
But some of the loans originally originated in 2011 and 2012. There's no liability for those years, but they are evidence for later years. The loans themselves went like 10 years, past 2014.
You literally can't overrule the statue of limitations wow lol.
I thought blm and antifa tore down that statue. They tore down all the others.
Which means that this will end up in the NY District Court, and if RELIEF is NOT found, NY STATE SUP CRT and FINALLY the SC...
This is an ADMINSTRATIVE LAW JUDGE...HE doesn't even know what a "contract clause" is much less the law about what PDJT has done...
NOTE: The NYC Property Appraiser HAD to be INVOLVED and write-off on the estimates of the building(s) and such...
This is going to backfire bigly on the AG & Judge...Shista' ALWAYS ROLLS DOWNHILL!!!!
Administrative judges are usually for traffic tickets revenue generation.
AND that is ABSOLUTELY correct...IF AND ONLY IF this case makes it to the NEXT LEVEL...this judge will more than likely be censored...Couldn't happend to a nicer Alpha Hotel (Ass Hotel)...f😁😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
This trial is in state supreme court in front of a New York Supreme Court judge.
https://ww2.nycourts.gov/courts/8jd/structure.shtml
Supreme Court The Supreme Court is the state-wide trial court with the broadest jurisdiction, both in criminal and civil matters. It can hear virtually any type of case brought before it, with the exception of claims brought against the state which must be heard by the Court of Claims. However, it generally hears only cases that are outside the jurisdiction of other trial courts of more limited jurisdiction.
Next would be the New York pellet division followed by the New York Court of Appeals That's the highest court in New York state.
I don't think this is true. I don't think anything regarding taxes is part of this case. Seems like only bank loans and insurance claims are.
They talked about a low appraisal of Mar-A-Lago in Florida. That have been for tax purposes
If only they pursued real criminals with such enthusiasm.