i watched a video of a young woman saying to to street preacher that IF he could show her proof that Jesus is real then she would be a Christian right then and there. he asked her if she has to have proof for everything in her life before she decides to do anything and she said YES.
so he says to her, when your dr hands you a prescription to get filled, do you take your science test kit with you and test that medicine before taking it for proof of what it is before taking the meds? she shut her pie hole.
The historical evidence for the Resurrection is much stronger than those uneducated on the subject may realize.
For anyone willing to engage with the facts, I recommend the minimal facts approach, which sticks only to facts that are multiply-attested and accepted as true by even the most skeptical scholars.
i watched a video of a young woman saying to to street preacher that IF he could show her proof that Jesus is real then she would be a Christian right then and there. he asked her if she has to have proof for everything in her life before she decides to do anything and she said YES.
so he says to her, when your dr hands you a prescription to get filled, do you take your science test kit with you and test that medicine before taking it for proof of what it is before taking the meds? she shut her pie hole.
The historical evidence for the Resurrection is much stronger than those uneducated on the subject may realize.
For anyone willing to engage with the facts, I recommend the minimal facts approach, which sticks only to facts that are multiply-attested and accepted as true by even the most skeptical scholars.
The Minimal Facts Approach to the Resurrection