There's a simple answer to this. I still don't like it, but it's not as bad as people seem to think. The US is responsible for the maintenance of most of the UN hardware. We also happen to have "donated" most of it to them. That's why all their crap is the stuff we were using a generation or two ago as far as military hardware goes.
So there's various places our military and government uses to store UN vehicles and hardware before either shipping it out (in the case of newly donated equipment), or bringing it back in for maintenance (in the case of equipment already in use).
So yeah, I don't like it, since we should neither be donating equipment to them nor maintaining it for them, but the sight of UN vehicles in the US is not THAT out of the ordinary.
Now if we see actual blue helmets or UN vehicles on the streets.....that's another matter entirely and justifies some elaborate target practice.
There's a simple answer to this. I still don't like it, but it's not as bad as people seem to think. The US is responsible for the maintenance of most of the UN hardware. We also happen to have "donated" most of it to them. That's why all their crap is the stuff we were using a generation or two ago as far as military hardware goes.
So there's various places our military and government uses to store UN vehicles and hardware before either shipping it out (in the case of newly donated equipment), or bringing it back in for maintenance (in the case of equipment already in use).
So yeah, I don't like it, since we should neither be donating equipment to them nor maintaining it for them, but the sight of UN vehicles in the US is not THAT out of the ordinary.
Now if we see actual blue helmets or UN vehicles on the streets.....that's another matter entirely and justifies some elaborate target practice.