Nikki Haley asserts that allowing people to post on social media anonymously is a "national security threat". She promises that as president, she will force "every person on social media" to be "verified by their name." (She likes to lose as many votes as possible) - The Great Awakening

213

Nikki Haley asserts that allowing people to post on social media anonymously is a "national security threat". She promises that as president, she will force "every person on social media" to be "verified by their name." (She likes to lose as many votes as possible) 🧠 These people are stupid!

posted 1 year ago by aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve 1 year ago by aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve +213 / -0

I like some Nikki, but have to agree with Christina here. Maybe Nikki would not be down with the anons and Q….lol.

Christina Pushaw 🐊 🇺🇸

@ChristinaPushaw

NEW: Nikki Haley asserts that allowing people to post on social media anonymously is a "national security threat". She promises that as president, she will force "every person on social media" to be "verified by their name."

I am no lawyer but isn't this blatantly unconstitutional? Free speech includes anonymous speech.

3:26 PM · Nov 14, 2023

https://twitter.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/1724524144954380794

51 comments

51 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (51)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Chungus53 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

These people make a lot more sense when you model them the same way you model a commercial. Their owners pay a lot of money to get them in front of the camera, and get the things they say into the public discussion - to pretend these things have public support.

Ten years ago, the entire GOP leadership sounded and looked like Nikki Haley. Now, the base has rejected them, and we're even seeing cracks among congressmen. The debates have gone from the default thing for any Republican to watch to a borderline infomercial, with similar audience enthusiasm and viewership.

permalink save report block reply