After Trump's lawyers asked for a mistrial, the judge asked the NY AG to respond to the motion. They asked for full separate hearing on the issue.
OAG’s position is that – putting aside the total lack of merit to Defendants’ application for a mistrial – it is preferable to have the Court hear and decide the application on full briefing pursuant to the OSC in the interest of judicial economy.
They asked for December 8th date because it's not urgent.
If the Court does order briefing, OAG requests until December 8, 2023 to submit its opposition given the demonstrable lack of urgency, the impending Thanksgiving holiday, and the fact that the ongoing trial necessitates considerable daily attention from OAG’s trial team.
Civil suits are often a way to address crimes like fraud.
The NY AG is asserting there is an injured party. Her assertion is, and they had a witness testify to this, that the Trump organization saved huge amounts of amount by getting cheaper loans.
The argument is something like if I lie on my mortgage application and get 2% loan when I qualify for a 6% or 8% loan, I've committed mortgage fraud. Even if I paid the mortgage off.
Trump is going to have to put on a defense against this. They are going to call his banker at Deutsch Bank. One of the issues in this trial is how much Trump will have to pay in what they call disgorgement. The AG put an investment banker on the stand to testify to $$$
I stand educated on it now. I appreciate it.
No problem.