After Trump's lawyers asked for a mistrial, the judge asked the NY AG to respond to the motion. They asked for full separate hearing on the issue.
OAG’s position is that – putting aside the total lack of merit to Defendants’ application for a mistrial – it is preferable to have the Court hear and decide the application on full briefing pursuant to the OSC in the interest of judicial economy.
They asked for December 8th date because it's not urgent.
If the Court does order briefing, OAG requests until December 8, 2023 to submit its opposition given the demonstrable lack of urgency, the impending Thanksgiving holiday, and the fact that the ongoing trial necessitates considerable daily attention from OAG’s trial team.
Which got me thinking. We've seen all these cases thrown out because they lacked standing. One of the things required for a case to have standing is that there needs to be an injured party. In this case, there isn't one. So how did the state even bring the case? How did the state have standing if there is no injured party?
By their own rules, this case should not have standing.
Tucker Carlson interviewed Martin Shkreli the MSM branded "Most Hated Man in America", who was sent to prison on "financial fraud" in the hedge fund industry, where there were no victims and everyone legally benefited. Shkreli says To Tucker, they are doing the same thing to Trump. Watch this video from the 18:00 mark to hear this fro yourself. My point is Letitia James and the judge know what they are doing. This is a Star Chamber and I think Trump's attorneys are recognizing it.