I keep thinking of 'as above, so below'. The Rothschilds are the top of the pyramid that we know. But if there is a pyramid above that, which is upside down; It could hold multiple families.
I agree, there must be many, many families richer than the Rothschilds. Using the same basic calculation shown in the video - If a family saved a more modest amount than the initial £20 million the Rothschilds saved, but saved their family's money earlier on in history, maybe in 1715 or 1615, there would have been more time to accrue compound interest.
Using a starting point of 1715 or 1615 is very conservative, as proof, these two articles are about inter generational family wealth that has lasted 600 and 800 years.
Agree, and to think the roths might just be a front/public facing family covering up more (families) than we know.
👍
I keep thinking of 'as above, so below'. The Rothschilds are the top of the pyramid that we know. But if there is a pyramid above that, which is upside down; It could hold multiple families.
I agree, there must be many, many families richer than the Rothschilds. Using the same basic calculation shown in the video - If a family saved a more modest amount than the initial £20 million the Rothschilds saved, but saved their family's money earlier on in history, maybe in 1715 or 1615, there would have been more time to accrue compound interest.
Using a starting point of 1715 or 1615 is very conservative, as proof, these two articles are about inter generational family wealth that has lasted 600 and 800 years.
Most generational wealth is destroyed by multiple inheritors who mostly squander the money.
Absolutely. The committee of 300 control the world.