I understand where you're coming from and I've used it for a few code projects as well. But its a shadow of what we could and should have.
There's the Leftist worldview and clear restrictions around many subjects. These alone are enormous. But other limitations like bare-bones contextual understanding, no capacity for understanding emotion and an inability to handle parallel tasks are all critical limitations that sadly were solved years ago.
Under normal circumstances, we'd see the technology incrementally improved and refined. But what we got with ChatGPT portends that as long as the status quo exists, we're never going to have true desktop AI because that could lead to an intellectual renaissance. This does not surprise me, but I had hoped that early iterations of open source AI might sneak through unscathed, but those hopes were foolish.
My post was not to say that Chat GPT is worthless. It certainly isn't. But it could have been a true game-changer in terms of the trajectory of the human race.
I understand where you're coming from and I've used it for a few code projects as well. But its a shadow of what we could and should have.
There's the Leftist worldview and clear restrictions around many subjects. These alone are enormous. But other limitations like bare-bones contextual understanding, no capacity for understanding emotion and an inability to handle parallel tasks are all critical limitations that sadly were solved years ago.
Under normal circumstances, we'd see the technology incrementally improved and refined. But what we got with ChatGPT portends that as long as the status quo exists, we're never going to have true desktop AI because that could lead to an intellectual renaissance. This does not surprise me, but I had hoped that early iterations of open source AI might sneak through unscathed, but those hopes were foolish.
My post was not to say that Chat GPT is worthless. It certainly isn't. But it could have been a true game-changer in terms of the trajectory of the human race.