While this is all true, the new wrinkle in this equation is the existence of the modern surveillance state. It goes way beyond the wet dreams of the Stasi and Gestapo.
They don't have the manpower to rule all of us, but they have more than enough manpower and tools to take us out a few at a time as we resist on a small scale.
That is where of goal of at least one for one is critical.
Also, the modern surveillance state has replaced the training in old school functions. While more and more compiled data is evaluated by AI, feeding it trash is definitely a must. Additionally, the focus is on watching meta-data, so trying to manually connect the dots on someone "off grid" takes real man power.
I saw one presentation on the Oct 7 Hamas attack, it concluded the ability to keep it secret was based on using zero technology, and the humans were apparently thoroughly vetted, so no meta-data for any AI or human to evaluate.
While this is all true, the new wrinkle in this equation is the existence of the modern surveillance state. It goes way beyond the wet dreams of the Stasi and Gestapo.
They don't have the manpower to rule all of us, but they have more than enough manpower and tools to take us out a few at a time as we resist on a small scale.
That is where of goal of at least one for one is critical.
Also, the modern surveillance state has replaced the training in old school functions. While more and more compiled data is evaluated by AI, feeding it trash is definitely a must. Additionally, the focus is on watching meta-data, so trying to manually connect the dots on someone "off grid" takes real man power.
I saw one presentation on the Oct 7 Hamas attack, it concluded the ability to keep it secret was based on using zero technology, and the humans were apparently thoroughly vetted, so no meta-data for any AI or human to evaluate.